People v. Wells

Decision Date30 May 2018
Docket NumberInd. No. 223/13,2014–11908
Citation161 A.D.3d 1200,77 N.Y.S.3d 668
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher WELLS, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

161 A.D.3d 1200
77 N.Y.S.3d 668

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Christopher WELLS, appellant.

2014–11908
Ind.
No. 223/13

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued February 6, 2018
May 30, 2018


77 N.Y.S.3d 669

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Michael Arthus of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, SANDRA L. SGROI, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Stephen J. Rooney, J.), rendered December 23, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination admitting certain surveillance video footage from the security system located in a building near the subject shooting, as the People presented sufficient evidence that the video footage accurately represented the events being depicted (see People v. Price , 29 N.Y.3d 472, 476, 58 N.Y.S.3d 259, 80 N.E.3d 1005 ; People v. Patterson , 93 N.Y.2d 80, 84, 688 N.Y.S.2d 101, 710 N.E.2d 665 ; People v. Lynes , 49 N.Y.2d 286, 291–292, 425 N.Y.S.2d 295, 401 N.E.2d 405 ).

We disagree with the Supreme Court's determination admitting photographs depicting the defendant found on Facebook and Instagram, inasmuch as the People failed to present sufficient evidence that the photographs were accurate and authentic (see People v. Price , 29 N.Y.3d at 479–480, 58 N.Y.S.3d 259, 80 N.E.3d 1005 ; cf. People v. Franzese , 154 A.D.3d 706, 707, 61 N.Y.S.3d 661 ). However, the admission of the photographs was harmless, as the proof of the defendant's guilt was overwhelming and there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted had the photographs not been admitted (see People v. Crimmins , 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241–242, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787 ).

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Pendell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 23, 2018
    ...the subject matter identified therein (see People v. Price, 29 N.Y.3d at 480, 58 N.Y.S.3d 259, 80 N.E.3d 1005 ; People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 [2018] ; compare People v. Dawkins, 240 A.D.2d 962, 964, 659 N.Y.S.2d 536 [1997], lvs denied 90 N.Y.2d 903, 663 N.Y.S.2d 51......
  • People v. Sarkodie
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 8, 2019
    ...or otherwise did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Hardy, 166 A.D.3d 645, 88 N.Y.S.3d 54 ; People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 1201, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 ). The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, is without merit ......
  • People v. Tebout
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 29, 2020
    ...for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Romero , 7 N.Y.3d 911, 912, 828 N.Y.S.2d 274, 861 N.E.2d 89 ; People v. Wells , 161 A.D.3d 1200, 1200–1201, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 ; People v. Spigner , 153 A.D.3d 1289, 1289–1290, 59 N.Y.S.3d 711 ). In any event, most of the challenged remarks w......
  • People v. Jordan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 13, 2020
    ...matter depicted" ( People v. Byrnes, 33 N.Y.2d 343, 347, 352 N.Y.S.2d 913, 308 N.E.2d 435 [1974] ; cf. People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 [2d Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 1009, 86 N.Y.S.3d 768, 111 N.E.3d 1123 [2018] ; see generally People v. Price, 29 N.Y.3d 472, 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Photographs, recordings, & x-rays
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2020 Contents
    • August 2, 2020
    ...victim’s dead body were introduced into evidence, defendant was not prejudiced by ive allegedly redundant photographs. People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 (2d Dept. 2018). he trial court properly admitted photographs taken by the medical examiner during the victim’s autopsy be......
  • Photographs, recordings, & x-rays
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2019 Contents
    • August 2, 2019
    ...of the photographs because the prosecutor was obligated to prove the essential elements of the crimes charged. People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 (2d Dept. 2018). he trial court properly admitted photographs taken by the medical examiner during the victim’s autopsy because th......
  • Photographs, recordings & x-rays
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2021 Contents
    • August 2, 2021
    ...not prejudiced by ive allegedly redundant photographs. PHOTOGRAPHS, RECORDINGS, X-RAYS §10:10 NEW YORK OBJECTIONS 10-8 People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 (2d Dept. 2018). he trial court properly admitted photographs taken by the medical examiner during the victim’s autopsy be......
  • Photographs, recordings & x-rays
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books New York Objections
    • May 3, 2022
    ...of the photographs because the prosecutor was obligated to prove the essential elements of the crimes charged. People v. Wells, 161 A.D.3d 1200, 77 N.Y.S.3d 668 (2d Dept. 2018). The trial court properly admitted photographs taken by the medical examiner during the victim’s autopsy because t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT