People v. White

• Decision Date: 28 June 2012
• Citation: 946 N.Y.S.2d 717,96 A.D.3d 1299,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05207
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dante WHITE, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

96 A.D.3d 1299
946 N.Y.S.2d 717
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05207

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Dante WHITE, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

June 28, 2012.

[946 N.Y.S.2d 718]

Salvatore C. Adamo, Albany, for appellant.

Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Emilee B. Davenport of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., STEIN and GARRY, JJ.

GARRY, J.

[96 A.D.3d 1299]Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County (Hall Jr., J.), rendered April 8, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, executed a waiver of the right to appeal, and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of four years followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Initially, we are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that he did not knowingly waive the right to appeal. Defendant was advised that the appeal waiver was part of the plea agreement and he executed a written waiver in open court after discussing the appeal waiver with counsel. Although County Court made a minimal inquiry, the record reveals that defendant's waiver of [96 A.D.3d 1300]the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice ( see People v. Binns, 82 A.D.3d 1449, 1450, 918 N.Y.S.2d 753 [2011];People v. McCaskill, 76 A.D.3d 751, 752, 905 N.Y.S.2d 721 [2010] ). Accordingly, defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea is foreclosed; it is also unpreserved, as there is no indication on this record that he moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Taylor, 89 A.D.3d 1143, 1143, 931 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2011] ). The exception to the preservation requirement is inapplicable, as defendant made no statements during the allocution that negated an essential element of the crime or otherwise cast doubt upon his guilt ( see People v. McFarren, 83 A.D.3d 1209, 1209–1210, 921 N.Y.S.2d 391 [2011],lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 860, 932 N.Y.S.2d 26, 956 N.E.2d 807 [2011] ).

To the extent that defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel relates to the voluntariness of the plea and, therefore, survives his appeal waiver, it is similarly unpreserved for our review given defendant's failure to move to...