People v. Williams, 2004-00261.

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation13 A.D.3d 661,786 N.Y.S.2d 357,2004 NY Slip Op 09678
Docket Number2004-00261.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Decision Date27 December 2004
13 A.D.3d 661
786 N.Y.S.2d 357
2004 NY Slip Op 09678
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
WILLIE WILLIAMS, Appellant.
2004-00261.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
December 27, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dickerson, J.), rendered December 16, 2003, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to vacate his plea, nor did he otherwise raise this issue before the Supreme Court (see People v Konstantinides, 295 AD2d 537, 538-539 [2002]; People v Coles, 240 AD2d 419 [1997]). The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel except to the extent that it affected the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Demosthene, 2 AD3d 874 [2003]; People v Herring, 274 AD2d 525, 526 [2000]; People v Holmes, 268 AD2d 597 [2000]). The defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]).

Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • People v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 11 Diciembre 2013
    ...N.Y.S.2d 372; People v. Carden, 27 A.D.3d 573, 810 N.Y.S.2d 365; People v. Eaton, 14 A.D.3d 577, 789 N.Y.S.2d 194; People v. Williams, 13 A.D.3d 661, 786 N.Y.S.2d 357; People v. Mercer, 204 A.D.2d 741, 612 N.Y.S.2d 650). Although the dissent concludes that these cases are of “limited preced......
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 2005
    ...N.E.2d 95 4 N.Y.3d 804 PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS (WILLIE). Court of Appeals of the State of New York. February 24, 2005. Appeal from 2d Dept.: 13 A.D.3d 661, 786 N.Y.S.2d 357 Application for leave to criminal appeal denied. (Graffeo, J.) ...
2 cases
  • People v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 11 Diciembre 2013
    ...N.Y.S.2d 372; People v. Carden, 27 A.D.3d 573, 810 N.Y.S.2d 365; People v. Eaton, 14 A.D.3d 577, 789 N.Y.S.2d 194; People v. Williams, 13 A.D.3d 661, 786 N.Y.S.2d 357; People v. Mercer, 204 A.D.2d 741, 612 N.Y.S.2d 650). Although the dissent concludes that these cases are of “limited preced......
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 2005
    ...N.E.2d 95 4 N.Y.3d 804 PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS (WILLIE). Court of Appeals of the State of New York. February 24, 2005. Appeal from 2d Dept.: 13 A.D.3d 661, 786 N.Y.S.2d 357 Application for leave to criminal appeal denied. (Graffeo, J.) ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT