People v. Williams
| Decision Date | 02 April 1990 |
| Citation | 553 N.Y.S.2d 818,160 A.D.2d 753 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Rhonda WILLIAMS, a/k/a Victoria Tribble, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Mary C. Rothwell, of counsel), for appellant.
John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Ivan Vogel, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BROWN, RUBIN and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), rendered September 3, 1987, convicting her of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15[5]. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that the People disproved the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Reed, 40 N.Y.2d 204, 386 N.Y.S.2d 371, 352 N.E.2d 558; People v. Martinez, 144 A.D.2d 699, 700, 535 N.Y.S.2d 3). In oral and videotaped statements made at the police precinct, the defendant, a prostitute, stated she entered the decedent's car in response to his solicitation. She admitted stabbing the decedent but claimed she had done so only after the decedent became "crazy" from smoking five vials of crack cocaine, grabbed her by the neck, and threatened her with a knife, which he pulled from underneath the seat in the vehicle. The defendant told the police that in the course of a struggle she managed to wrest the knife away from the decedent and stab him. As she fled from the scene, the defendant threw the knife behind a storefront grate. Her boyfriend later retrieved the knife and hid it under a sewer grate.
At the trial, the People presented the testimony of a toxicological expert who found no evidence of alcohol or narcotics in the decedent's blood or urine, and concluded that the test results were inconsistent with the decedent having smoked five vials of crack cocaine prior to his death. The People also presented testimony that the defendant, when interviewed by the police,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Komynar
...the defendant's conduct and the surrounding circumstances (see People v. Dietz, 97 A.D.3d 692, 947 N.Y.S.2d 891 ; People v. Williams, 160 A.D.2d 753, 553 N.Y.S.2d 818 ). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15......
-
Williams v. Lord
...297] (1973)." The Appellate Division affirmed her conviction, without commenting on the evidentiary issue. People v. Williams, 160 A.D.2d 753, 553 N.Y.S.2d 818 (2d Dep't 1990). In a letter dated April 16, 1990, Williams sought leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, claiming, "Whe......
-
People v. Komynar
...may be inferred from the defendant's conduct and the surrounding circumstances (see People v Dietz, 97 A.D.3d 692; People v Williams, 160 A.D.2d 753). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danie......
-
People v. White
...the jury apparently rejected the defendant's version of events and chose to believe the People's witnesses (see, People v. Williams, 160 A.D.2d 753, 754, 553 N.Y.S.2d 818). Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily que......