People v. Williams

Decision Date05 April 1979
Citation390 N.E.2d 299,46 N.Y.2d 1070,416 N.Y.S.2d 792
Parties, 390 N.E.2d 299 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Joseph WILLIAMS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Though the prosecutor's summation comment suggesting that the defendant may have engaged in other criminal conduct was prejudicial in nature, the Trial Judge's lucid curative instructions to the jury, following which neither any further objection nor any request for a mistrial was made, must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant's satisfaction.

The other prosecutorial summation statements to which defendant has drawn our attention went without objection at all. Consequently, they are not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05, subd. 2; People v. Utley, 45 N.Y.2d 908, 411 N.Y.S.2d 6, 383 N.E.2d 558). Had the summation excesses assumed due process proportions depriving defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial and had they been preserved, the harmless error doctrine, on which the Appellate Division relied, would, of course, have been inapplicable (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237-238, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 217-219, 326 N.E.2d 787, 790-792; People v. Savvides, 1 N.Y.2d 554, 154 N.Y.S.2d 885, 136 N.E.2d 853).

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
83 cases
  • Brunson v. Tracy, 03-CV-1895 (DLI)(ASC).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 2, 2005
    ...satisfaction" People v. Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 944, 620 N.Y.S.2d 814, 644 N.E.2d 1370 (1994) (citing People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 1071, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 (1979)); see also Garcia v. Lewis, 188 F.3d 71, 78-79 (2d Cir.1999). The decision of the state court, having rested ......
  • People v. Baldi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 16, 1980
    ...People v. Savvides, 1 N.Y.2d 554, 154 N.Y.S.2d 885, 136 N.E.2d 853 (prosecutorial misconduct); see, also, People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299; cf. People v. Cook, 42 N.Y.2d 204, 209, 397 N.Y.S.2d 697, 366 N.E.2d 788 (COOKE, J., dissenting)). We do not believ......
  • Brown v. Reid, 80 Civ. 2092.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 26, 1980
    ...comply with a state's contemporaneous objection rule. 7 New York C.P.L. § 470.05(2) (McKinney's 1971). See People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 (1979) (error in summation); People v. Cicchetti, 44 N.Y.2d 803, 805, 406 N.Y.S.2d 285, 287, 377 N.E.2d 739, 740 (1......
  • People v. Duell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 2, 2015
    ...A.D.2d 842, 842–843, 737 N.Y.S.2d 181, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 656, 745 N.Y.S.2d 515, 772 N.E.2d 618, quoting People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 1071, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 ; see People v. Robinson, 111 A.D.3d 1358, 1359, 975 N.Y.S.2d 830, lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 1141, 983 N.Y.S.2d 49......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT