People v. Williams
Decision Date | 05 April 1979 |
Citation | 390 N.E.2d 299,46 N.Y.2d 1070,416 N.Y.S.2d 792 |
Parties | , 390 N.E.2d 299 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Joseph WILLIAMS, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Though the prosecutor's summation comment suggesting that the defendant may have engaged in other criminal conduct was prejudicial in nature, the Trial Judge's lucid curative instructions to the jury, following which neither any further objection nor any request for a mistrial was made, must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant's satisfaction.
The other prosecutorial summation statements to which defendant has drawn our attention went without objection at all. Consequently, they are not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05, subd. 2; People v. Utley, 45 N.Y.2d 908, 411 N.Y.S.2d 6, 383 N.E.2d 558). Had the summation excesses assumed due process proportions depriving defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial and had they been preserved, the harmless error doctrine, on which the Appellate Division relied, would, of course, have been inapplicable (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237-238, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 217-219, 326 N.E.2d 787, 790-792; People v. Savvides, 1 N.Y.2d 554, 154 N.Y.S.2d 885, 136 N.E.2d 853).
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brunson v. Tracy, 03-CV-1895 (DLI)(ASC).
...satisfaction" People v. Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 944, 620 N.Y.S.2d 814, 644 N.E.2d 1370 (1994) (citing People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 1071, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 (1979)); see also Garcia v. Lewis, 188 F.3d 71, 78-79 (2d Cir.1999). The decision of the state court, having rested ......
-
People v. Baldi
...People v. Savvides, 1 N.Y.2d 554, 154 N.Y.S.2d 885, 136 N.E.2d 853 (prosecutorial misconduct); see, also, People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299; cf. People v. Cook, 42 N.Y.2d 204, 209, 397 N.Y.S.2d 697, 366 N.E.2d 788 (COOKE, J., dissenting)). We do not believ......
-
Brown v. Reid, 80 Civ. 2092.
...comply with a state's contemporaneous objection rule. 7 New York C.P.L. § 470.05(2) (McKinney's 1971). See People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 (1979) (error in summation); People v. Cicchetti, 44 N.Y.2d 803, 805, 406 N.Y.S.2d 285, 287, 377 N.E.2d 739, 740 (1......
-
People v. Duell
...A.D.2d 842, 842–843, 737 N.Y.S.2d 181, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 656, 745 N.Y.S.2d 515, 772 N.E.2d 618, quoting People v. Williams, 46 N.Y.2d 1070, 1071, 416 N.Y.S.2d 792, 390 N.E.2d 299 ; see People v. Robinson, 111 A.D.3d 1358, 1359, 975 N.Y.S.2d 830, lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 1141, 983 N.Y.S.2d 49......