People v. Williams

Decision Date29 March 1974
Citation34 N.Y.2d 657,311 N.E.2d 650,355 N.Y.S.2d 578
Parties, 311 N.E.2d 650 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bobby WILLIAMS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Joseph Alan Kaplan, William Gallagher and Bonnie Brower, New York City, for appellant.

Mario Merola, Dist. Atty. (Charles S. Fax, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 43 A.D.2d 531, 349 N.Y.S.2d 86, should be reversed and the proceedings remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for resentence, which shall be limited to a maximum of three years, under whatever sentencing provision may be lawfully applicable.

While the resentence in the present case does not fall precisely under the formulation in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 it is violative of the spirit and purpose of the reasoning in that case. The possibility of a resentence with a longer maximum term would discourage a prisoner from pursuing a collateral attack on his sentence, however benevolent the purpose of the resentence. It suffices that the prisoner was not responsible for the conditions which brought about, from his point of view, a more severe sentence. Absent postjudgment conduct by a prisoner meriting a more severe sentence, one should not be imposed.

BREITEL, C.J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, SAMUEL RABIN and STEVENS, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed and case remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum herein.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Stewart v. Scully
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 1, 1991
    ...33 A.D.2d 587, 304 N.Y.S.2d 296; cf., People v. Miller, 65 N.Y.2d 502, 493 N.Y.S.2d 96, 482 N.E.2d 892; People v. Williams, 34 N.Y.2d 657, 355 N.Y.S.2d 578, 311 N.E.2d 650). 144 A.D.2d at 602, 534 N.Y.S.2d at Stewart thereafter petitioned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) for a writ of......
  • People v. Konigsberg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 12, 1988
    ...more severe sentence ( see, North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 726, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 2081, 23 L.Ed.2d 656; People v. Williams, 34 N.Y.2d 657, 355 N.Y.S.2d 578, 311 N.E.2d 650). The issue thus distills to whether County Court's silence in 1978 had the effect of imposing a concurrent or co......
  • People v. Miller
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 11, 1985
    ...610). In that sense he is "responsible for the conditions which brought about * * * a more severe sentence" (People v. Williams, 34 N.Y.2d 657, 658, 355 N.Y.S.2d 578, 311 N.E.2d 650) for, as the judge who sentenced defendant after his jury trial put it, "the consideration for the bargain yo......
  • People v. Alvarez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1991
    ...502, 493 N.Y.S.2d 96, 482 N.E.2d 892 [1985], cert. denied 474 U.S. 951, 106 S.Ct. 317, 88 L.Ed.2d 300; People v. Williams, 34 N.Y.2d 657, 355 N.Y.S.2d 578, 311 N.E.2d 650 [1974]; People v. Alvarez, 134 A.D.2d 599, 521 N.Y.S.2d 497 [1987] supra, lv. denied 71 N.Y.2d 892, 527 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 5......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT