People v. Wright
| Decision Date | 24 December 2002 |
| Citation | 300 A.D.2d 191,750 N.Y.S.2d 863 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>KOCEDRAL WRIGHT, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The court properly exercised its discretion in granting the People's motion for consolidation of legally similar charges pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c). In opposing the People's motion, defendant's efforts to show that he had important testimony to give concerning the second indictment and a strong need to refrain from testifying as to the first indictment were conclusory and unconvincing (see People v Lane, 56 NY2d 1; People v Anderson, 118 AD2d 788, 789-790, lv denied 67 NY2d 1050, cert denied 479 US 859). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the consolidation since his proposed defense against the second indictment would have opened the door to evidence of the crimes charged in the first indictment (see People v McCune, 210 AD2d 978, lv denied 85 NY2d 864; see also People v Hudson, 273 AD2d 83, lv denied 95 NY2d 890).
We also note that, during the consolidated trial, defendant did not testify, and that defense counsel specifically explained that this was primarily because of the court's Sandoval ruling (which is not challenged on appeal). Moreover, there was overwhelming evidence supporting the sole charge of which defendant was convicted, and he was acquitted of the other charges.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Terrell
...35 A.D.3d 246, 825 N.Y.S.2d 52 [1st Dept. 2006] [three knifepoint robberies as evidence of modus operandi]; People v. Wright , 300 A.D.2d 191, 192, 750 N.Y.S.2d 863 [1st Dept. 2002] ). "Nor does the fact that crimes of a sexual nature were involved in each incident provide a sufficient basi......
- People v. Cotto