People v. Youngblood

• Decision Date: 13 June 2013
• Citation: 107 A.D.3d 1159,967 N.Y.S.2d 215,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 04375
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

107 A.D.3d 1159
967 N.Y.S.2d 215
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 04375

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

June 13, 2013.

[967 N.Y.S.2d 216]

John A. Cirando, Syracuse, for appellant.

Nicole M. Duve, District Attorney, Canton (Jonathan L. Becker of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., STEIN, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.

LAHTINEN, J.P.

[107 A.D.3d 1159]Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered December 12, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant, a prison inmate, was charged in an indictment with promoting prison contraband in the first degree after a makeshift metal weapon was found secreted in his shoe. He thereafter pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of 1 1/2 to 3 years. He now appeals.

[107 A.D.3d 1160]The record does not reflect that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and, indeed, he declined an opportunity to withdraw his plea at sentencing. His challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is accordingly unpreserved for our review and we do not view this case as falling within the narrow exception to the preservation rule ( see People v. McNair, 13 N.Y.3d 821, 822, 892 N.Y.S.2d 822 920 N.E.2d 929, 920 N.E.2d 929 [2009];People v. Steed, 17 A.D.3d 928, 929, 793 N.Y.S.2d 620 [2005],lv. denied5 N.Y.3d 770, 801 N.Y.S.2d 264, 834 N.E.2d 1274 [2005];see also People v. Sardinas, 159 A.D.2d 963, 963, 552 N.Y.S.2d 776 [1990],lv. denied76 N.Y.2d 742, 558 N.Y.S.2d 904, 557 N.E.2d 1200 [1990] ). Regardless, the record demonstrates that County Court explored defendant's doubts as to whether he knowingly possessed the item and confirmed that his decision to plead guilty was a knowing and voluntary one ( see People v. Ferro, 101 A.D.3d 1243, 1244, 956 N.Y.S.2d 225 [2012],lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 1098, 965 N.Y.S.2d 794, 988 N.E.2d 532 [2013];People v. Tavares, 282 A.D.2d 880, 881, 728 N.Y.S.2d 501 [2001],lv. denied

[967 N.Y.S.2d 217]

96 N.Y.2d 868, 730 N.Y.S.2d 43, 754 N.E.2d 1126 [2001];cf. People v. Hill, 16 N.Y.3d 811, 813–814, 921 N.Y.S.2d 181, 946 N.E.2d 169 [2011] ).

While defendant's contention that he received the...