Perry v. Crawford & Co.

Decision Date13 October 1983
Citation677 P.2d 416
Docket Number83CA0214
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
PartiesRonald PERRY, Petitioner, v. CRAWFORD & COMPANY, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado, and Director, Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Labor, State of Colorado, Respondents. . II
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Question Submitted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, In re, 87SA127
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1988
    ...an injury to be compensable under the Act, there must be a sufficient nexus between the employment and the injury. Perry v. Crawford & Co., 677 P.2d 416 (Colo.App.1983). The determination of whether an employee's injuries arose out of an employment relationship depends largely on the facts ......
  • Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co. v. Baca
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1985
    ...however, under special circumstances in which a causal connection exists between the employment and the injury. Perry v. Crawford & Co., 677 P.2d 416 (Colo.App.1983). Thus, if an employee's travel is at the express or implied request of the employer, or if the travel confers a benefit on th......
  • Stamper v. Hiteshew
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 12, 1990
    ...for an injury to be compensable under the Act, a sufficient nexus must exist between the employment and the injury. Perry v. Crawford & Co., 677 P.2d 416 (Colo.App.1983). An injury is compensable under the "(a) Where, at the time of the injury, both employer and employee are subject to the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT