Peterson v. Carolina
| Decision Date | 17 March 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 07–9232.,07–9232. |
| Citation | 76 USLW 3498,128 S.Ct. 1682,170 L.Ed.2d 377,552 U.S. 1271 |
| Parties | Michael Iver PETERSON, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 361 N.C. 587, 652 S.E.2d 216.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
28 cases
-
Townsend v. Stancil
...Id. at 160, 655 S.E.2d at 390 (quoting State v. Peterson, 361 N.C. 587, 602, 652 S.E.2d 216, 227 (2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1271, 170 L.Ed.2d 377 (2008)).Relevant evidence is "evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of t......
-
State v. Murrell
...606, 652 S.E.2d 216, 229 (2007) (citing State v. Jones, 355 N.C. 117, 131, 558 S.E.2d 97, 106 (2002)), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1682, 170 L.Ed.2d 377 (2008). Under this standard, we apply a two-part analysis: "`[T]his Court first determines if the remarks were improper. . . . N......
-
State v. Locklear
...of the prior death, even though the defendant was never criminally charged with the earlier death), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1682, 170 L.Ed.2d 377 (2008). Defendant argues that, even if admissible, the evidence was excessively prejudicial, requiring its exclusion under Rule of ......
-
State v. Styles
...652 S.E.2d 216, 226 (2007) (citing State v. Cummings, 361 N.C. 438, 471-72, 648 S.E.2d 788, 808 (2007), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1682, 170 L.Ed.2d 377 (2008)), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1682, 170 L.Ed.2d 377 (2008). Here, there is absolutely no evidence (much less c......
Request a trial to view additional results