Peterson v. State, SC16–289
Decision Date | 06 July 2017 |
Docket Number | No. SC16–1279,No. SC16–289,SC16–289,SC16–1279 |
Citation | 221 So.3d 571 |
Parties | Robert Earl PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Robert Earl Peterson, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Frank Tassone and Casey Woolsey of Tassone & Dreicer, LLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer L. Keegan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Robert Earl Peterson appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion to vacate his conviction of first-degree murder and sentence of death filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the postconviction court's order denying postconviction relief as to the guilt phase and also deny Peterson's separate habeas petition. However, because Peterson's jury recommended death by a vote of seven to five and his sentence became final in 2012, see Peterson v. State , 94 So.3d 514, 523 (Fla.), cert. denied , 568 U.S. 1071, 133 S.Ct. 793, 184 L.Ed.2d 586 (2012), Peterson is entitled to a new penalty phase under Hurst v. State (Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , No. 16–998, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 . See Mosley v. State , 209 So.3d 1248, 1283 (Fla. 2016).
Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder and evidence tampering, and was sentenced to death for the first-degree murder of his 64-year-old stepfather, Roy Andrews, after Peterson's jury recommended death by a vote of seven to five. Peterson , 94 So.3d at 519, 523. The facts of Peterson's crime are set forth in this Court's opinion affirming his conviction and sentences on direct appeal:
, where the gun was pressed against the victim's head. One gunshot wound was at Andrews' left temple. The other wound entered over Andrews' right ear, and the bone fragments from this wound severed the brain stem, which was fatal.
After the State rested, Peterson testified in his defense, denying that he killed Andrews. Peterson testified that he had visited Bike Week one time, and while there, he bought about four Bike Week hats. According to Peterson, on the day before the murder, he went to his mother's house to buy lottery tickets for her and saw Andrews sitting in his truck. Andrews had a trickle of blood coming from his nose, so Peterson helped wipe it away. He then left and bought the tickets as he planned to do. When he brought the tickets back to his mother's house, he noticed the interior light of the truck was on, so he reached into Andrews' truck and turned off the light, knocking off his hat. He did not reach down to retrieve his hat because he was in a hurry to return to his hotel room with his girlfriend.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hilton v. State
...performance under prevailing professional standards." Allen v. State , 261 So. 3d 1255, 1269 (Fla. 2019) (quoting Peterson v. State , 221 So. 3d 571, 583 (Fla. 2017) ). Accordingly, "strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been con......
-
Davis v. State
...judge for alleged bias or prejudice is regulated substantively by section 38.10 and procedurally by rule 2.330.1 See Peterson v. State, 221 So. 3d 571, 581 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Gore v. State, 964 So. 2d 1257, 1268 (Fla. 2007) ). Section 38.10 provides in relevant part that:Whenever a party ......
-
Wagner v. State
...facts alleged ... would not ‘place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial.’ " Peterson v. State , 221 So. 3d 571, 581 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Livingston v. State , 441 So. 2d 1083, 1087 (Fla. 1983) ).In cases in which an independent basis for disqualifi......
-
Allen v. State, SC17-1623
...to have so affected the fairness and reliability of the proceeding that confidence in the outcome is undermined. Peterson v. State , 221 So.3d 571, 583 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Schoenwetter v. State , 46 So.3d 535, 546 (Fla. 2010) ). To establish the Strickland deficiency prong, "the defendant ......