Phillips v. Phillips

Decision Date07 November 2014
Docket NumberNo. 2D13–1233.,2D13–1233.
Citation151 So.3d 58
PartiesMatthew Lane PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. Nofar PHILLIPS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Annette Marie Lang and Robert E. Biasotti of Biasotti and Associates, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Matthew Lane Phillips appeals an injunction for protection against domestic violence entered in favor of his estranged wife, Nofar Phillips.He argues that the trial court abused its discretion by entering the injunction because Mrs. Phillips failed to establish that she had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming the victim of domestic violence.We agree and reverse.

In order for the trial court to issue an injunction for protection against domestic violence, the party seeking the injunction must establish that he or she has an objectively reasonable fear that he or she is in “imminent danger of becoming the victim of any act of domestic violence.”§ 741.30(1)(a), Fla. Stat.(2012);seeOettmeier v. Oettmeier,960 So.2d 902, 904(Fla. 2d DCA2007);Moore v. Hall,786 So.2d 1264, 1266(Fla. 2d DCA2001).In determining whether the victim's fear is reasonable, “the trial court must consider the current allegations, the parties' behavior within the relationship, and the history of the relationship as a whole.”Giallanza v. Giallanza,787 So.2d 162, 164(Fla. 2d DCA2001)(citingGustafson v. Mauck,743 So.2d 614, 616(Fla. 1st DCA1999) ).

Here, the evidence was legally insufficient to meet the statutory requirements for issuance of a domestic violence injunction.Despite the allegations in her petition, Mrs. Phillips acknowledged in her testimony at the injunction hearing that there had been no violence or threats of violence from Mr. Phillips since the parties' separation four months before she filed the domestic violence petition.Because Mrs. Phillips failed to establish that she was the victim of domestic violence or that she had a reasonable fear of becoming the victim of domestic violence, we reverse.SeeOettmeier,960 So.2d at 905;Moore,786 So.2d at 1267.

Although the injunction has expired, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the injunction because of the unintended collateral consequences that may result from such a judgment.SeeYoung v. Smith,901 So.2d 372, 373(Fla. 2d DCA2005);Stone v. Stone,128 So.3d 239, 242(Fla. 4th DCA2013).

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Bell v. Battaglia
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 2022
    ...injunction ‘because of the unintended collateral consequences that may result from such a judgment.’ " (quoting Phillips v. Phillips , 151 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) )); see also Stover v. Stover , 287 So. 3d 1277, 1278 n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (concluding that the expiration of the dom......
  • Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Poinciana Grocer, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 7, 2014
  • Quinones-Dones v. Mascola
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 24, 2020
    ...of a recent threat or act of violence, they cannot support the issuance of a domestic violence injunction. Phillips v. Phillips, 151 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ; accord Giallanza, 787 So. 2d at 164 (reversing order granting petition to extend injunction where wife never alleged additi......
  • Magloire v. Obrenovic
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 11, 2020
    ...allegations, the parties' behavior within the relationship, and the history of the relationship as a whole.’ " Phillips v. Phillips, 151 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (quoting Giallanza v. Giallanza, 787 So. 2d 162, 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ). The evidence established that Ms. Obrenovic an......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT