Phoenix v. State
| Decision Date | 21 June 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 63535,63535 |
| Parties | Michael Harrison PHOENIX, Steven Michael Trusz, Morton Neal Hall, Jr., and Richard Hale, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Max P. Engel of the Law Offices of Max P. Engel, Miami, for petitioners.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Marlyn J. Altman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal, State v. Phoenix, 428 So.2d 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), certified by that court as involving a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified question concerns the scope of the authority of law enforcement officers to conduct citizen's arrests. We approve the decision below which held that a sheriff and sheriff's deputies can make a valid arrest outside their jurisdiction even though they have used their police car and have identified themselves as police officers when making the arrest.
This case involves the arrest of petitioners in St. Lucie County by the sheriff and deputies of Martin County. On June 23, 1979, at about 1:00 a.m., an officer of the Martin County sheriff's office saw some gasoline cans in the back of a camper-covered pickup truck. Upon hearing the report of this observation, the sheriff of Martin County ordered officers to follow the truck. An officer in a surveillance airplane saw the truck enter St. Lucie County, but then lost sight of it. The sheriff and officers of Martin County entered St. Lucie County where they observed a fence gate upon which a chain had been cut and a new lock affixed. The gate was located at the entrance to a ranch which the officers suspected was possibly being used as an airstrip. The sheriff and deputies waited there until around 6:00 a.m., when the surveillance pilot reported seeing an aircraft and two camper-top pickup trucks (but not the one that had aroused suspicion) on the ranch grounds. The Martin County sheriff then notified the sheriff of St. Lucie County of the suspected activity. The two pickup trucks were then observed departing the ranch; one moved north in St. Lucie County while the other proceeded south into Martin County. The Martin County sheriff and a deputy stopped the northbound truck in St. Lucie County and, guns drawn and blue lights flashing, arrested the occupants. They discovered marijuana in the truck. The passengers of the southbound truck were arrested in Martin County.
The petitioners were charged with trafficking in marijuana. They moved to suppress the evidence. The trial judge ruled that the stop and search of the truck in St. Lucie County, having been carried out by the sheriff of Martin County "under color of office" outside his jurisdiction, were unlawful. The evidence found in the truck, along with evidence from the other truck and from the aircraft, and an incriminating statement, were suppressed.
The district court of appeal reversed. Although agreeing with the trial court that the officers had no official authority to stop and arrest the defendants in St. Lucie County, the district court reasoned that the officers might have properly conducted a common-law citizen's arrest. On motion for rehearing, the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:
Can an arrest be validated as a "citizen's arrest"
(1) if the arrest resulted from an intentional surveillance conducted by police officers outside their jurisdiction utilizing a police aircraft and officers on the ground and,
(2) if the police officers used a marked police car and asserted their official position in stopping the arrestees?
428 So.2d at 267. We answer the questions in the affirmative.
At common law, a private citizen could make an arrest without a warrant in certain specific circumstances:
A private citizen does have the common law right to arrest a person who commits a felony in his presence, or to arrest a person where a felony has been committed, and where the arresting citizen has probable cause to believe, and does believe, the person arrested to be guilty. Even though there was time to obtain a warrant, a private citizen may make such an arrest and justify his failure to obtain a warrant by proving the person arrested was actually guilty of a felony.
Collins v. State, 143 So.2d 700, 703 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 148 So.2d 280 (Fla.1962). See also State v. Shipman, 370 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 381 So.2d 769 (Fla.1980).
Common sense dictates that law enforcement officials, when they are outside their jurisdictions, should not be any less capable, by virtue of their position, of making a felony arrest than a private citizen. But because there are jurisdictional limitations on law enforcement...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rebalko v. City of Coral Springs
..., 852 So. 2d 390, 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting State v. Phoenix , 428 So. 2d 262, 266 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), approved , 455 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1984) ). Here, on the facts alleged, the Officers were not engaged in a lawful extra-jurisdictional investigation when they arrested Mr. Rebalk......
-
People v. LaFontaine
...a private person (see, People v. Lahr, supra; State v. Stevens, supra; State v. Phoenix, 428 So.2d 262 [Fla.Ct.App.4th Dist.1982], affd. 455 So.2d 1024; see also, United States v. Heliczer, 373 F.2d 241 [2d Cir.1967], cert. denied 388 U.S. 917, 87 S.Ct. 2133, 18 L.Ed.2d 1359; United States ......
-
State v. Miller
...were lawful as citizen's arrests include the following: State v. Goldberg, 112 Ariz. 202, 540 P.2d 674 (1975); Phoenix v. State, 455 So.2d 1024 (Fla.1984); State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Juncewski, 308 N.W.2d 316 (Minn.1981); State v. MacDonald, 260 N.W.2d 626 This court in Shienle recogn......
-
People v. La Fontaine
...(Fla.Dist.Ct.App., Second Dist.1962), cert. denied, 148 So.2d 280 (1962); State v. Phoenix, 428 So.2d 262 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982), aff'd, 455 So.2d 1024 (Fla.Supreme Ct.1984); State v. Filipi, 297 N.W.2d 275 (Minn.1980). Consequently, such apprehension falls within the ambit of the Fourth Am......