Pierce v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

Decision Date11 April 1910
Citation127 S.W. 707,94 Ark. 489
PartiesPIERCE v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal fro Drew Circuit Court; Henry W. Wells, Judge; affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Williamson & Williamson, for appellant.

The relation of passenger and carrier being established, the passenger is entitled to damages for mental suffering caused by insulting and abusive conduct of the carrier's agent toward the passenger. 3 Mason 245; Fed. Cas. No. 2575; 1 East 106; 103 Ill. 549; 3 Cliff. 416; 106 Mass. 180; 6 Ind.App. 205; 80 Md. 23; 62 Me. 90; 62 N.J.L. 286; 4 Ell. Rds. § 1638; 90 N.Y. 588; 8 Bush 147; 85 Ky. 547; 36 Wis 657; 133 N.Y. 261; 18 Ill.App. 620; 62 F. 440; 54 L.R.A. 572; 59 Id. 590; 12 Id. 339; 66 Id. 618; 46 Id. 549; 31 Id. 390; 69 Miss. 421; 102 Ga. 479; 12 S.W. 275; 15 S.W. 469; 30 S.W. 574; 178 N.Y. 349; 10 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 476; 1 Id. 353; 13 Id. 399; 94 N.W. 922; 74 S.W. 576; 71 S.W. 535; 96 S.W. 102; 97 S.W. 1007; 39 S.W. 124; 69 S.W. 994; 63 S.W. 895.

W. E. Hemingway, E. B. Kinsworthy, E. A. Bolton, and Jas. H. Stevenson, for appellee.

There can be no recovery against a railroad company for mental anguish alone. 84 Ark. 42; 89 Ark. 187; 70 Ark. 136; 64 Ark. 538; 76 Ark. 348; 67 Ark. 123; 82 Ark. 289; 4 Suth. Dam. 1245; 23 Mo.App. 216; 88 Ga. 763; 6 Nev. 224; 71 Me. 227; 147 Pa. 40.

OPINION

HART, J.

On the 30th day of August, 1908, M. V. Pierce embarked on one of the passenger trains of the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company at Warren, Ark., for Monticello, Ark. When the train auditor came to him to take up his ticket, Pierce informed him that he had reached the station too late to purchase a ticket, and tendered his fare in money. The auditor at first refused to receive it, and cursed and abused Pierce in the presence of the other passengers, and threatened to eject him from the train. The conductor interfered, and the auditor then received his fare, and permitted him to go to his destination, but continued to curse and abuse him.

These facts were alleged by Pierce in a suit filed by him against the railway company to recover damages on account of the humiliation and mental suffering occasioned him by the auditor's conduct. The railway company demurred to the complaint. The demurrer was sustained, and the complaint was dismissed. Pierce has appealed to this court.

In the case of St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Taylor, 84 Ark. 42, 104 S.W. 551, the court held (quoting syllabus): "Mental suffering alone, unaccompanied by physical injury or any other element of recoverable damages, cannot be made the subject of an independent action against a carrier for damages, even where the act or violation of the duty complained of was wilfully committed."

The rule was approved and applied in the case of Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Moss, 89 Ark. 187, 116 S.W. 192.

Counsel for appellant recognize the rule announced in these cases, but ask us to overrule it, as being against the weight of authority and the better reasoning on the subject.

The authorities bearing on the question were thoroughly considered and reviewed in the case of St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Taylor, supra, and no useful purpose can be served by again discussing the question. It is sufficient to say that the conclusion was reached in that case after a careful and deliberate consideration of the question, and no additional arguments are advanced for overruling these cases.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Rogers v. Williard
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1920
    ... ... of Mitchell v. Rochester Railway Co., 151 ... N.Y. 107, 34 L. R. A. 781, 45 N.E ... in the case of Pierce v. St. L., I. M. & So. Ry ... Co., 94 Ark. 489, ... ...
  • M. B. M. Co., Inc. v. Counce
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1980
    ...in such subsequent cases as Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Moss, 89 Ark. 187, 116 S.W. 192, and Pierce v. St. Louis, Iron Mt. & S. Ry. Co., 94 Ark. 489, 127 S.W. 707. In the latter case, we explicitly declined an invitation to overrule Taylor in this We had also held that the use......
  • Stevenson v. John J. Grier Hotel Co.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 21, 1923
    ...unaccompanied by physical injury or other element of recoverable damage. 64 Ark. 546; 67 Ark. 129; 70 Ark. 143; 84 Ark. 43; 89 Ark. 188; 94 Ark. 489; 33 Ark. 360; 76 S.W. (Tex. App.) Prewett Semmes, in reply; Charles M. Bryan, George E. Neuhardt and Arthur G. Brodie, of counsel. Cases cited......
  • Pierce v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1910
    ... ...         Action by M. V. Pierce against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. From a judgment dismissing the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT