Pierce v. State, 95-2393

Decision Date22 October 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-2393,95-2393
Citation681 So.2d 873
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D2296 Arnett Frazier PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. First District
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham, II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges convictions and sentences imposed for various offenses, including three counts of resisting an officer with violence as proscribed by section 843.01, Florida Statutes. Because this statute refers to "any" officer, and the three counts in the present case are predicated on one incident during which the appellant resisted or opposed three officers, only one conviction is permitted in connection with this single episode. See State v. Watts, 462 So.2d 813 (Fla.1985). Two of these convictions are therefore reversed and, as it appears that this will alter the presumptive sentencing range under the Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702 guidelines, all of the appellant's sentences are vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing upon a corrected guidelines scoresheet. E.g. Stepps v. State, 675 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The other convictions are affirmed.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Wallace v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 10, 1998
    ...We have for review Wallace v. State, 689 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), which certified conflict with the decision in Pierce v. State, 681 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), on the issue of whether section 843.01, Florida Statutes (1993), permits more than one conviction predicated on a single......
  • Hill v. State, 97-1852
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 12, 1998
    ...test" has since been legislatively overruled by the adoption in 1988 of section 775.021(4)(b), Florida Statutes. In Pierce v. State, 681 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), this court held that multiple convictions for resisting an officer with violence in violation of section 843.01, Florida St......
  • Allen v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 27, 2012
    ...Watts, Florida courts have applied the “a/any” test as dispositive on the issue of what is a unit of prosecution. See Pierce v. State, 681 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (section 843.01 permits only one conviction of resisting an officer during a single incident, involving multiple officers)......
  • Jones v. State, 97-964
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 27, 1998
    ...counts of resisting an officer with violence arising out of a single episode, even if multiple officers are involved. Pierce v. State, 681 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Wells v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2010, --- So.2d ---- (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 19, 1997), review granted, 705 So.2d 10 (Fla.1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT