Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Strickland, 38732
| Citation | 249 Ga. 829,294 S.E.2d 471 |
| Decision Date | 07 September 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 38732,38732 |
| Parties | PLANTATION PIPE LINE COMPANY v. STRICKLAND, Comr. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Edward T. Floyd, Atlanta, for Plantation Pipe Line Co.
Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Warren R. Calvert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for W. E. Strickland, Comr.
Plantation Pipe Line appeals from an order of the Fulton Superior Court granting appellee State Department of Revenue's motion for summary judgment. This case concerns a dispute over a February 13, 1981 Revenue Department assessment against Plantation for a $35,168 deficiency in its annual "corporate net worth" taxes for the years 1974 through 1980. See former Code Ann. §§ 92-2401 and 2403 (now codified in Code Ann. Ch. 91A-63). Plantation refused to pay, asserting that the manner of computing its tax under former Code Ann. §§ 92-2401 and 2403 is unconstitutional. It appealed the assessment to the superior court pursuant to Code Ann. § 91A-255, and now brings this appeal directly from the unfavorable ruling of that court.
The department has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. It argues that Plantation has failed to comply with the appellate procedures set out in Code Ann. § 6-701.1. We agree.
"Appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of ... State and local administrative agencies ... shall be by application in the nature of a petition enumerating the errors to be urged on appeal and stating why the appellate court has jurisdiction." Code Ann. § 6-701.1(a) and (b). This court recently recognized that a Revenue Department assessment is a decision of a state administrative agency within the meaning of § 6-701.1. Wheeler v. Strickland, 248 Ga. 85, 231 S.E.2d 556 (1981).
Plantation Pipe Line did not file an application for discretionary appeal from the decision of the Fulton Superior Court reviewing the decision of the State Department of Revenue, but chose to appeal directly to this court pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701(a). Having failed to comply with the procedure for appeal required by § 6-701.1, Plantation's appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Int'l Keystone Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Inc.
..., 253 Ga. 385, 387, 320 S.E.2d 358 (1984) (judicial review under Administrative Procedure Act); Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Strickland , 249 Ga. 829, 829, 294 S.E.2d 471 (1982) (judicial review under Revenue Code). But we also have applied it in appeals from judgments entered upon petitions......
- Banks v. State
-
Grogan v. City of Dawsonville
...a "decision" of a "state administrative agency" and, therefore, a discretionary application was required); Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Strickland, 249 Ga. 829, 294 S.E.2d 471 (1982) (dismissing direct appeal of summary judgment upholding decision of a state administrative agency). In granti......
- Birdsong v. State