Pollini v. Fuller Road Fire Dept

Decision Date09 May 1974
Citation34 N.Y.2d 744,357 N.Y.S.2d 502,313 N.E.2d 793
Parties, 313 N.E.2d 793 Mario POLLINI, Appellant, v. FULLER ROAD FIRE DEPARTMENT et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Zola A. Aronson, New York City, for appellant.

E. Richard Rimmels, Jr., and Frederic H. Montfort, Mineola, for Hicksville Fire Dept. and Hicksville Fire Dist., respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

We agree with the Appellate Division, 39 A.D.2d 554, 331 N.Y.S.2d 732 that plaintiff is limited to his statutory remedy. The Hicksville Fire District can be considered a person or agency within the intendment of subdivision (3) of section 19 of the Volunteer Firemen's Benefit Law. We do not find, however, as that court did, any inconsistency in this result with that reached by the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Giuliano v. Town of Brunswick, 32 A.D.2d 705, 300 N.Y.S.2d 27 where it was held that the injured fireman, employed by the Town of North Greenbush Fire District, could maintain an action against the Town of Brunswick. There, that section (Volunteer Firemen's Benefit Law, § 19, subd. (3)) did not stand in plaintiff's way because the defendant town (as opposed to the defendant fire district in the instant case) could in no respect be considered a 'person or agency'. We would also remark that in Holland v. Baker, 61 Misc.2d 201, 305 N.Y.S.2d 6, affd. 33 A.D.2d 626, 305 N.Y.S.2d 9, where the plaintiff attempted to sue the political subdivision which his fire company served, the action was correctly dismissed although the court mistakenly relied on subdivision (3) of section 19 rather than on subdivision (2).

BREITEL, C.J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and STEVENS, JJ., concur.

SAMUEL RABIN, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1980
    ...Book 63B, p. 12, see, also, p. 29), a conclusion which is consistent with the result we reached in Pollini v. Fuller Rd. Fire Dept., 34 N.Y.2d 744, 357 N.Y.S.2d 502, 313 N.E.2d 793. 3 We leave the question open also because, though the word "employ" does not necessarily import employment fo......
  • Lima v. State
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1989
    ...§ 156[6]. Pollini v. Fuller Rd. Fire Dept., 66 Misc.2d 523, 321 N.Y.S.2d 411, affd 39 A.D.2d 554, 331 N.Y.S.2d 732, affd 34 N.Y.2d 744, 357 N.Y.S.2d 502, 313 N.E.2d 793, relied on by claimants-appellants is not to the contrary but rather is consistent with our analysis. In Pollini, the defe......
  • Fitzsimmons v. State, 52207
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 1974
  • Lima v. Rockland County
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 19, 1987
    ...either a "person or agency" as defined in the Volunteer Firefighters' Benefit Law § 19(3) (see, Pollini v. Fuller Road Fire Dept., 34 N.Y.2d 744, 745, 357 N.Y.S.2d 502, 313 N.E.2d 793; Giuliano v. Town of Brunswick, 32 A.D.2d 705, 300 N.Y.S.2d 27, lv. dismissed 25 N.Y.2d 740, 905, 304 N.Y.S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT