Pope v. State, 88-787
Decision Date | 20 April 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 88-787,88-787 |
Citation | 542 So.2d 423,14 Fla. L. Weekly 1010 |
Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1010 Daniel Joseph POPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Nancye R. Crouch, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Defendant appeals from a sentence imposed after the trial judge announced oral reasons for departure, but failed to provide written reasons. We must vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing for failure to provide written reasons. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), receded from on other grounds, Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla.1987).
A more troublesome issue raised in this appeal is the contention of appellant that in remanding the case for resentencing, we must advise the trial court that he is now precluded from entering a departure sentence because it was not done properly the first time. We reject that contention, but not without observing that the various district courts are in disarray on the issue of the proper instruction to be given the trial court when a cause is remanded due to the trial court's failure to initially provide written reasons for a departure sentence. Compare, e.g., Daughtry v. State, 521 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988) ( ) with Jenkins v. State, 528 So.2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) ( ); compare Padgett v. State, 534 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ( ) 1 with Rangel v. State, 532 So.2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ( ); compare Schmeisser v. State, 527 So.2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) ( ) with Florence v. State, 532 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) ( ). See also State v. Lawler, 531 So.2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) ( ).
We agree with those cases which permit the trial court, on remand, to supply written reasons for departure where only oral reasons were given at sentencing. We find nothing in Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987) which prohibits this result.
In Oden v. State, 463 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), approved, State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985) the appellate court vacated a departure sentence for failure of the trial court to provide written reasons, and remanded for resentencing. In so doing, the court observed that "[s]hould the trial court again decide to depart from the guidelines, it should follow the requirements of Jackson [v. State, 454 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) ( ) ]." In Barbera v. State, 505 So.2d 413 (Fla.1987), in vacating a downward departure sentence, the supreme court remanded for resentencing "so that the trial judge can write out his specific reasons for departure." Nothing in the opinion distinguishes the writing requirements in mitigated sentences from those in aggravated sentences. We therefore reject the defendant's contention that the trial judge may not depart from the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Arnold
...the scoresheet and impose a guidelines sentence unless a guidelines departure is supported by written reasons. Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). 2 However, since there appears to be some confusion as to the terms and conditions of the plea, defendant should be given an oppor......
- Pope v. State
-
Reed v. State, 89-1525
...Gen., Tallahassee, Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), rev. granted, 550 So.2d 467 AFFIRMED. DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PETERSON, Judge. C......
-
Vara v. State, 87-03355
...prohibits the trial court from articulating in writing previously pronounced valid departure reasons upon resentencing. Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., 1 In Davis, there was no evidence that the son actually witnessed his mother's shootin......