Powell v. Clauss
| Decision Date | 25 April 1983 |
| Citation | 93 A.D.2d 883,461 N.Y.S.2d 413 |
| Parties | Theodore POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Jed CLAUSS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C., Mattituck (Eric J. Bressler, Mattituck, of counsel), for appellant.
Posner & Posner, Mount Vernon (Linda S. Jamieson, Mount Vernon, of counsel), for William Sirignano, receiver-respondent.
Before GIBBONS, J.P., and GULOTTA, O'CONNOR and NIEHOFF, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment to determine the ownership of a publishing house, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 9, 1982, which, upon the respondent receiver's motion to punish him for contempt of a prior order of the same court, adjudged him in contempt and permitted him to purge himself thereof by, inter alia, rendering an account.
Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The record before this court fails to indicate whether defendant was adjudged guilty of civil or criminal contempt, and at the hearing which must be conducted, the course being pursued must be made clear. Adjudging defendant to be in criminal contempt is not warranted on this record, as there is no finding that the alleged disobedience of the prior order of the court was willful, and similarly an adjudication of civil contempt is not warranted because there is no finding that defendant's actions were calculated to or actually did defeat, impair or prejudice the rights and remedies of the plaintiff (see Matter of Ross v. Sherwood Diversified Servs., 88 A.D.2d 936, 450 N.Y.S.2d 872).
Also, defendant denied that he had failed to turn over any assets of Queens House, as was alleged by the receiver. Questions of fact were raised on that and other issues that could not be resolved without a hearing (see Crisona v. Eastern Props. Improvement Corp., 27 A.D.2d 717, 717-718, 277 N.Y.S.2d 477; Kamen v. Kamen, 13 A.D.2d 985, 216 N.Y.S.2d 715).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garry v. Garry
... ... Criminal contempt requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that a party willfully violated a court order. See Powell v. Clauss, 93 A.D.2d 883, 461 N.Y.S.2d 413 (2d Dept.1983); Yorktown Central School District v. Y.C.T., 42 A.D.2d 422, 348 N.Y.S.2d 367, 372 (2d ... ...
-
Terry, Matter of
... ... § 753; Oppenheimer v. Oscar Shoes, Inc., 111 A.D.2d 28, 488 N.Y.S.2d 693 (1st Dept.,1985); Powell v. Clauss, 93 A.D.2d 883, 461 N.Y.S.2d 413 (2nd Dept., 1983) ... Finally, the Commissioner argues that she should not be held in ... ...
-
Manswell v. Baptiste
... ... Oscar Shoes , 111 A.D.2d 28, 488 N.Y.S. 2d 693 [1st Dept. 1985], citing Judiciary Law 753 ; Powell v. Clauss , 93 A.D.2d 883, 461 N.Y.S. 2d 413 [2d Dept. 1983] ). Defendants' obvious disregard of all the court mandates from inception of this civil ... ...
-
Drimmer, Matter of
... ... was to be punished for civil or criminal contempt, and at the hearing which must be conducted, the course being pursued should be made clear (Powell v. Clauss, 93 A.D.2d 883, 461 N.Y.S.2d 413; Matter of Ross v. Sherwood Diversified Servs., 88 A.D.2d 936, 450 N.Y.S.2d 872). In the event that ... ...