Powers v. Hurmert
| Decision Date | 31 October 1872 |
| Citation | Powers v. Hurmert, 51 Mo. 152 (Mo. 1872) |
| Parties | RICHARD L. POWERS, Respondent, v. JOHN HURMERT, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Powers v. Hurmert 51 Mo. 136, affirmed.
Appeal from Adair Circuit Court.
De France & Halliburton, for Appellant.
Ellison & Ellison, for Respondent.
This was an action of trespass. The facts and questions involved are the same as in the case of Powers vs. Hurmert, de cided at this term, and must be disposed of in the same way.
Judgment affirmed.
Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Bliss absent.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
- Fischer & Co. v. Anslyn
-
Virginia D. Biggers v. St. Louis Mut. House-Building Co. No. 3
...the same upon an examination separate and apart from her husband, the deed and acknowledgment are void.-- Wannall v. Kem, 57 Mo. 478; s. c. 51 Mo. 152; Wag. Stats. 935, sect. 14. A relinquishment of all her ““““right, title, and interest” is not a relinquishment of her dower.--Wag. Stats. 9......
-
Wannall v. Kem
... ... notary derives his authority to take acknowledgments from the statute, and courts of equity do not aid the defective execution of statutory powers. (Chauvin vs. Wagner, 18 [51 Mo. 152]Mo., 531; Moreau vs. Detchmendy, 18 Mo., 522; Bright vs. Boyd, 1 Story R. 486, and 1 Story's ... ...