Powers v. Hurmert
| Decision Date | 31 October 1872 |
| Citation | 51 Mo. 152 |
| Parties | RICHARD L. POWERS, Respondent, v. JOHN HURMERT, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Powers v. Hurmert 51 Mo. 136, affirmed.
Appeal from Adair Circuit Court.
De France & Halliburton, for Appellant.
Ellison & Ellison, for Respondent.
This was an action of trespass. The facts and questions involved are the same as in the case of Powers vs. Hurmert, de cided at this term, and must be disposed of in the same way.
Judgment affirmed.
Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Bliss absent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
- Fischer & Co. v. Anslyn
-
Virginia D. Biggers v. St. Louis Mut. House-Building Co. No. 3
...the same upon an examination separate and apart from her husband, the deed and acknowledgment are void.-- Wannall v. Kem, 57 Mo. 478; s. c. 51 Mo. 152; Wag. Stats. 935, sect. 14. A relinquishment of all her ““““right, title, and interest” is not a relinquishment of her dower.--Wag. Stats. 9......
-
Wannall v. Kem
... ... notary derives his authority to take acknowledgments from the statute, and courts of equity do not aid the defective execution of statutory powers. (Chauvin vs. Wagner, 18 [51 Mo. 152]Mo., 531; Moreau vs. Detchmendy, 18 Mo., 522; Bright vs. Boyd, 1 Story R. 486, and 1 Story's Eq., 97-177.)2d ... ...