Pozo v. Sunset Real Estate Partners

• Decision Date: 11 August 2021
• Docket Number: No. 3D20-1438,3D20-1438
• Citation: 322 So.3d 1236 (Mem)
• Parties: Guillermo POZO, Appellant, v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc., Appellee.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

322 So.3d 1236 (Mem)

Guillermo POZO, Appellant,

v.SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D20-1438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 11, 2021

Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez, for appellant.

Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and Robert C. Josefsberg, for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100(a) ("If an answer or third-party answer contains an affirmative defense and the opposing party seeks to avoid it, the opposing party must file a reply containing the avoidance." (emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the statute of limitations is four years for "[a]ny action not specifically provided for" in the statute); Manatee Cty. v. Mandarin Dev., Inc., 301 So. 3d 372, 375–76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) ("Declaratory judgment actions are subject to a four-year statute of limitations." (citing § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015) )).