Professional Services, Inc. v. Amaitis, 20102
Decision Date | 06 December 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 20102,20102 |
Citation | 592 S.W.2d 396 |
Parties | PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. Larry AMAITIS, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Roger D. Bush, Edmund R. Wood, Chancellor & Wood, Dallas, for appellant.
William M. Hayner, John J. O'Boyle, Cooper, Hayner, Miller & Long, Dallas, for appellee.
Before GUITTARD, C. J., and CARVER and STOREY, JJ.
Professional Services, Inc. (P.S.I.) appeals from a judgment in favor of Amaitis assessing damages for breach by P.S.I. of an employment contract. The court awarded the amount of the unpaid salary for the term of employment without allowing P.S.I. credit for Amaitis' actual earnings during the same period. We reverse and remand because the correct measure of damages must include credit for actual earnings.
Amaitis was hired by P.S.I. for a two-year term at $30,000.00 a year plus benefits. Amaitis was discharged with about eight months left on his contract. He then filed suit for his unpaid salary. Trial was had after the expiration of the term of employment, and P.S.I. sought to show Amaitis' actual earnings during the period of time from discharge to the end of the term. The trial court sustained the objection to the evidence offered on this point on the ground that P.S.I. did not Plead mitigation and was therefore not entitled to develop that defense or offset.
An employee who has been wrongfully discharged before the termination of his contract of employment must endeavor to mitigate or reduce his loss or damage by seeking other employment. Cole v. City of Houston, 442 S.W.2d 445, 451 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1969, no writ). The correct measure of damages for a wrongfully discharged employee is the present cash value of the contract to the employee, if it had not been breached, less any amounts that he should, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, be able to earn through other employment. Dixie Glass Co. v. Pollak, 341 S.W.2d 530, 538 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston 1960), Writ ref'd n.r.e., 162 Tex. 440, 347 S.W.2d 596 (1961). Appellee has called our attention to an opinion from California, Erler v. Five Points Motors, 249 Cal.App.2d 560, 57 Cal.Rptr. 516 (1967), which discusses the requirement that mitigation, with respect to employment contracts, be affirmatively raised in a defensive pleading. The California court held that what an employee has actually done to reduce his damages may be shown under a general denial, but those steps that an employee could have taken, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, to reduce his damages (i. e. "true mitigation of damages") cannot be shown unless it is affirmatively alleged. This result is consistent with Texas authorities which hold that the fact that a plaintiff, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, might have minimized his damage is a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.
...defense. W.L. Moody & Co. v. Rowland, 100 Tex. 363, 99 S.W. 1112, 1114-16 (1907); see also Professional Servs., Inc. v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.). The final issue to resolve regarding the duty to mitigate is to which types of actions by the ......
-
Edwards v. Aaron Rents, Inc.
...and unemployment compensation benefits. Stanley Stores v. Chavana, 909 S.W.2d 554, 563 (Tex.App.1995); Prof'l Serv., Inc. v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex.Civ.App. 1979). In addition, while failure to plead offset waives offset as an affirmative defense, pleading mitigation as an affirm......
-
Winograd v. Willis
...Crow Forgings, Inc. v. Casarez, 749 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1988, writ denied); Professional Services, Inc. v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Point two is In their final point of error appellants claim that the district court committed ......
-
Lee-Wright, Inc. v. Hall, LEE-WRIGH
...other employment. Gulf Consolidated Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983); Professional Serv. Inc. v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.). A wrongfully discharged employee, however, is bound only to use reasonable diligence, and if no ......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...potential damages will be calculated based upon the remainder of the unexpired term of the contract. See Prof’l Servs., Inc., v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1979, writ ref’d The calculation is more difficult when the contract was not for a specified term. Exact preci......
-
Wrongful discharge
...damages will be calculated based upon the remainder of the unexpired term of the contract. See Prof’l Servs., Inc., v. Amaitis , 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.). The calculation is more difficult when the contract was not for a specified term. Exact preci......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...damages will be calculated based upon the remainder of the unexpired term of the contract. See Prof’l Servs., Inc., v. Amaitis , 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.). The calculation is more difficult when the contract was not for a specified term. Exact preci......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...damages will be calculated based upon the remainder of the unexpired term of the contract. See Prof’l Servs., Inc., v. Amaitis , 592 S.W.2d 396, 397 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.). The calculation is more difficult when the contract was not for a specified term. Exact preci......