Prototype Mach. Co. v. Boulware, 04-07-00662-CV.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
Citation292 S.W.3d 169
Docket NumberNo. 04-07-00662-CV.,04-07-00662-CV.
PartiesPROTOTYPE MACHINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Toledo P. BOULWARE, Individually and as Trustee; Dos Angeles, L.P.; Zach and Kayla Davis; DMC Partners, Ltd.; Willie Jo Dooley, L.P.; Hayden G. Haby and Doris Y. Haby; Hayden G. Haby, Jr. and Dennette Haby Coates; Melanie and John Jones in Their Capacity as Joint Representatives of The Ben Jones Jr. Estate and Ben Jones Sr. Estate; McDaniel Farms, Inc.; Jewel F. Robinson and 4-S Ranch; Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District; and Darlene Shahan in Her Capacity as General Manager of Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District, Appellees.
Decision Date08 April 2009
292 S.W.3d 169
PROTOTYPE MACHINE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Toledo P. BOULWARE, Individually and as Trustee; Dos Angeles, L.P.; Zach and Kayla Davis; DMC Partners, Ltd.; Willie Jo Dooley, L.P.; Hayden G. Haby and Doris Y. Haby; Hayden G. Haby, Jr. and Dennette Haby Coates; Melanie and John Jones in Their Capacity as Joint Representatives of The Ben Jones Jr. Estate and Ben Jones Sr. Estate; McDaniel Farms, Inc.; Jewel F. Robinson and

[292 S.W.3d 170]

4-S Ranch; Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District; and Darlene Shahan in Her Capacity as General Manager of Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District, Appellees.
No. 04-07-00662-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.
April 8, 2009.

Phillip Poplin, Stuart Henry, Henry & Poplin, Austin, TX, for Appellant.

Max Renea Hicks, Law Office of Max Renea Hicks, Edmond R. McCarthy, Jackson, Sjoberg, McCarthy & Wilson, Paul M. Terrill, III, Hazen & Terrill, P.C., Austin, TX, Tully Shahan, Brackettville, TX, Louis T. Rosenberg, Law Office of Louis T. Rosenberg, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Appellees.

Sitting: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice.

[292 S.W.3d 171]

OPINION

Opinion by SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.


This appeal arises from the trial court's order striking appellant's plea in intervention. In an opinion and judgment dated December 17, 2008, we concluded that because appellant was denied notice of the motion to strike and an opportunity to be heard on the motion to strike, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. The appellant and appellees all filed motions for rehearing, which we deny. However, to address an argument raised by appellees on rehearing, we vacate our earlier judgment, withdraw our earlier opinion, and issue this opinion and judgment in their place.

BACKGROUND

Appellee, Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District ("the District"), regulates groundwater withdrawals in Kinney County, and issues permits to authorize the continuation of "historic" and "existing" beneficial, non-wasteful uses of groundwater from the Edwards-Trinity aquifer. Appellant, Prototype Machine Company ("Prototype"), is a landowner in Kinney County, Texas and holds a permit to withdraw groundwater. Appellees, Toledo P. Boulware, Individually and as Trustee; Zach and Kayla Davis; DMC Partners, Ltd.; Willie Jo Dooley, L.P.; Hayden G. Haby and Doris Y. Haby; Hayden G. Haby, Jr. and Dennette Haby Coates; Melanie and John Jones in Their Capacity as Joint Representatives of The Ben Jones Jr. Estate and Ben Jones Sr. Estate; McDaniel Farms, Inc.; Jewel F. Robinson and 4-S Ranch (collectively, "Applicants") are also Kinney County landowners and applicants for existing and historic use permits.

In July 2005, the Applicants sued the District and the District's former General Manager, Darlene Shahan, on various causes of action arising out of the District's administrative permitting decisions relating to the Applicants' permit applications.1 After protracted litigation in both state and federal courts, the District and the Applicants agreed to mediation, which commenced on July 17, 2007. By August 13, 2007,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • In the Matter of The Marriage of J.B. And H.B. In Re State , 05-09-01170-CV.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • December 8, 2010
    ...of a motion to strike. Guar. Fed. Sav. Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co., 793 S.W.2d 652, 657 (Tex.1990); Prototype Mach. Co. v. Boulware, 292 S.W.3d 169, 172 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, no pet.); Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., 966 S.W.2d 573, 586 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pet. denied) (en ban......
  • Liles v. Contreras, 04-16-00636-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • March 21, 2018
    ...to serve other parties with notice not less than three days before time specified for hearing); Prototype Mach. Co. v. Boulware , 292 S.W.3d 169, 172 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, no pet.) (reversing and remanding 547 S.W.3d 292trial court’s order striking intervention when movant failed to ......
  • In The Matter Of The Marriage Of J.B. And H.B. In Re State Of Texas, 05-09-01170-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • August 31, 2010
    ...of a motion to strike. Guar. Fed. Sav. Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co., 793 S.W.2d 652, 657 (Tex. 1990); Prototype Mach. Co. v. Boulware, 292 S.W.3d 169, 172 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, no pet.); Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., 966 S.W.2d 573, 586 (Tex. App.— San Antonio 1998, pet. denied) (en......
  • Sonat Exploration Co. v. Cudd Pressure Control Inc., 06–10–00096–CV.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • May 9, 2011
    ...by a motion to strike. Guar. Fed. Sav. Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co., 793 S.W.2d 652, 657 (Tex.1990); Prototype Mach. Co. v. Boulware, 292 S.W.3d 169 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2009, no...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT