Public Employees Relations Com'n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n
| Decision Date | 11 April 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 64835,64835 |
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 221,467 So.2d 987 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 221 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. DADE COUNTY POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Stuart M. Lerner, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Public Employees Relations Comm'n, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Donald D. Slesnick II of the Law Offices of Donald D. Slesnick II, Miami, for respondent.
This is a petition to review Dade County Police Benevolent Association v. City of Homestead, 444 So.2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), in which the district court, in a split decision, reversed an order of the Florida Public Employees Relations Commission assessing damages against the Dade County Police Benevolent Association for a wildcat strike by City of Homestead police officers. The district court held that the Commission lacked the authority to disturb the hearing officer's finding that there was no legal agency between the police officer's elected representative and the Police Benevolent Association that made the Association responsible for the actions of the representative in instigating the wildcat strike in violation of chapter 447, Florida Statutes (1979). The district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
Whether PERC may overturn a hearing officer's ultimate determination of agency in light of what it perceives to be the applicable law and relevant policy considerations.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answer the question in the affirmative, quash the majority opinion, and adopt the dissenting opinion of Judge Nesbitt as the opinion of this Court.
It is important to recognize at the outset that the relevant facts detailed in the district court opinion are not in dispute. The issue before the hearing officer was whether the police officers' elected representative to the Police Benevolent Association was acting within his general or special authority as representative to the Association when he called the strike. The resolution of this issue required a determination of how the law of agency should be applied to the undisputed facts of this case. The hearing officer found that, under the facts, the representative was not acting as an agent of the association. The Public Employees Relations Commission, in reversing the hearing officer's recommendation, adopted the hearing officer's findings of fact, but concluded that the hearing officer had misapplied the law of agency to those findings of fact. The district court disagreed. It reinstated the hearing officer's recommendation, holding that a hearing officer's findings of fact are binding upon the agency, absent a specific finding that they are not based upon competent, substantial evidence or are the product of proceedings which do not comport with essential requirements of law.
We hold that how the law of agency should be applied is an interpretation of law and policy and not a determination of fact. See § 120.68(7), Fla.Stat. (1983). We agree with the Public Employees Relations Commission that the ultimate authority to administratively interpret chapter 447 and article I, section 6, of the Florida Constitution, which deal with state regulation of labor organizations, resides with the Commission and not a hearing officer. The Commission has the principal responsibility of interpreting the statutory provisions consistent with the legislature's intent and objectives. See School Board of Dade County v. Dade Teachers Association, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Miami v. F.O.P. Miami Lodge 20
...and its decision to reinstate the officers is entitled to great weight by our courts. See Public Employees Relations Commission v. Dade County Police Benevolent Association, 467 So.2d 987 (Fla.1985). However, in light of the compelling legal authority and policy reasons discussed throughout......
-
White v. Metropolitan Dade County
...persuasive force and effect when that action is not in plain conflict with the statute. Public Employees Relations Comm'n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n, 467 So.2d 987, 989 (Fla.1985). In this case, the county amply established before the trial judge that it placed the FDCA on notic......
-
Palm Harbor Special Fire Control Dist. v. Kelly
...agency's interpretation of matters entrusted by statute to its discretion or expertise. Public Employees Relations Commission v. Dade County Police Benevolent Association, 467 So.2d 987 (Fla.1985); Daniel v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 213 So.2d 585 (Fla.1968). However, this deference......
-
Metropolitan Dade County v. P.J. Birds, Inc.
...is consistent with legislative intent and is supported by substantial, competent evidence." Public Employees Relations Comm'n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n, 467 So.2d 987, 988 (Fla.1985). Here, the Board interpreted the "Over-fifty" portion of the ordinance to be applicable where t......