Rabat v. GNAC Corp.
| Decision Date | 20 February 1992 |
| Citation | 579 N.Y.S.2d 407,180 A.D.2d 540 |
| Parties | Laurice RABAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GNAC CORP., a/k/a Golden Nuggett Hotel & Casino, Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before CARRO, J.P., and MILONAS, ELLERIN and ROSS, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about February 4, 1991, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that she sustained personal injuries when she slipped and fell on a clear liquid substance on the floor of a restroom in defendant's casino. Her pleadings claim actual notice of the condition by reason of the presence of defendant's employees on the premises prior to the accident, and constructive notice of the condition by reason of its duration. After plaintiff filed a note of issue and a statement of readiness representing that all pretrial proceedings had been completed, defendant moved for summary judgment, relying on the pleadings and deposition testimony given by plaintiff and a security officer employed by defendant on the date of the accident and arguing that there was no proof tending to show that defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition. The motion was granted.
It is well settled that proof of notice, either actual or constructive, is essential to recovery by a plaintiff who has fallen as a result of a foreign substance on the floor of a commercial establishment. The plaintiff must present evidence tending to show either that the defendant knew of the dangerous condition and did not remedy it, or that the condition had existed for a sufficient length of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have corrected it or warned of its existence (Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774); Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, affd., 64 N.Y.2d 670, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252, 474 N.E.2d 612.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing the motion for summary judgment, we find that she has failed to raise a triable issue of fact to support the essential element of actual or constructive notice, there being no evidence that the condition was created by defendant or had existed for a period of time sufficient to afford defendant, in the exercise of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hammond-Warner v. US, CV 91-1699.
...Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 647, 492 N.E.2d 774, 775 (Ct.App.1986); Rabat v. GNAC Corp., 180 A.D.2d 540, 579 N.Y.S.2d 407, 408 (1st Dep't 1992). Plaintiff does not claim that the Postal Service had actual notice of the alleged slushy condition. Thus, she must......
-
Melton v. E.P.S. Hair Design, Inc.
...a result, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact and the complaint should have been dismissed (see, Rabat v. GNAC Corp., 180 A.D.2d 540, 541, 579 N.Y.S.2d 407). ...
-
Josephson v. Crane Club, Inc.
...notice of the slippery substance and glass on the dance floor or that they had created the hazardous condition (see, Rabat v. GNAC Corp., 180 A.D.2d 540, 579 N.Y.S.2d 407). In opposition, plaintiff argued that discovery had not been completed and that examination of other employees would be......
-
Rose v. Da Ecib USA
...by a plaintiff who has fallen as a result of a foreign substance on the floor of a commercial establishment" (Rabat v. GNAC Corp., 180 A.D.2d 540, 579 N.Y.S.2d 407). On this key issue, plaintiff surely raised questions of fact for the jury. Where the defendant actually created the dangerous......