Randolph County v. Johnson, S07A0328.
| Decision Date | 11 June 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. S07A0328.,S07A0328. |
| Parties | RANDOLPH COUNTY et al. v. JOHNSON. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Franklin T. Coleman III, Hodges, Erwin, Hedrick & Coleman, LLP, Albany, for Appellant.
Maurice Luther King, Jr., Albany, for Appellee.
The question for decision in this case is whether an appeal from a writ of prohibition preventing the board of elections from conducting a hearing on the sufficiency of a candidate whose name was already placed on the ballot is moot after the occurrence of the general election. The short answer is "yes."
After deciding to seek re-election to the Randolph County Board of Commissioners, Johnson filed his nomination petition. At the time, the Probate Judge of Randolph County served as the election superintendent by operation of law. The election superintendent/probate judge accepted Johnson's petition and placed his name on the general election ballot.
Thirty days after the U.S. Attorney General pre-cleared Georgia, the board of elections resumed its election responsibilities. The board of elections then noticed an insufficiency in Johnson's nomination petition and in turn, scheduled a hearing for November 1, 2006, six days before the general election, to address the alleged insufficiency. In response, Johnson petitioned the Superior Court of Randolph County for a writ of prohibition to prevent the board of elections from going forward with the hearing. On November 1, 2006, the superior court granted Johnson's petition, prohibiting the board of elections from holding the hearing.
Johnson was re-elected in the general election, and the board of elections appealed.
1. Under Georgia law an appeal will be dismissed if the question presented has become moot. OCGA § 5-6-48(b)(3). An appeal becomes moot if the rights insisted upon could not be enforced by a judicial determination. Haley v. Bailey, 199 Ga. 486, 34 S.E.2d 685 (1945).
This Court has acknowledged that the "mootness doctrine applies to election contest cases when the general election has already taken place." Jordan v. Cook, 277 Ga. 155, 157, 587 S.E.2d 52 (2003). Thus, this Court has not been hesitant to dismiss an appeal from an election contest following the occurrence of the election. See, e.g., Palmer v. Conner, 247 Ga. 35, 35, 273 S.E.2d 612 (1981) (). It is also well established that after a candidate's name is placed on the ballot and the candidate is elected to office, a party...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barrow v. Beskin
...or rights." Pimper v. State of Ga. , 274 Ga. 624, 626, 555 S.E.2d 459 (2001) (footnotes omitted). See also Randolph County v. Johnson , 282 Ga. 160, 160, 646 S.E.2d 261 (2007) ("An appeal becomes moot if the rights insisted upon could not be enforced by a judicial determination."). Moreover......
-
Johnson v. Randolph County
...County Grand Jurors, 280 Ga. 790, 792(6), 633 S.E.2d 337 (2006) (citations and punctuation omitted). 6. See Randolph County v. Johnson, 282 Ga. 160, 646 S.E.2d 261 (2007). 7. Cohran v. Carlin, 249 Ga. 510, 512, 291 S.E.2d 538 (1982) (citations omitted). 8. See Davis v. Harpagon Co., 281 Ga.......
-
Scoggins v. Collins
...by the occurrence of the general election. See Bodkin v. Bolia, 285 Ga. 758, 759-760, 684 S.E.2d 241 (2009); Randolph County v. Johnson, 282 Ga. 160, 161(1), 646 S.E.2d 261 (2007). See also Brooks v. Brown, 282 Ga. 154, 154, 646 S.E.2d 265 (2007) (in general, pre-election challenges to a ca......
-
Parham v. Stewart
...becomes moot if the rights insisted upon could not be enforced by a judicial determination." Randolph Cty. v. Johnson , 282 Ga. 160, 160, 646 S.E.2d 261 (2007). Citing policy reasons and relying on this Court’s holding in Kendall , supra , Appellee argues that, because Appellant failed to s......