Raulerson v. State, A96A2076
| Citation | 479 S.E.2d 386,223 Ga.App. 556 |
| Decision Date | 14 November 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. A96A2076,A96A2076 |
| Parties | , 96 FCDR 4095 RAULERSON v. The STATE. |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Solomon & Edgar, M. Theodore Solomon II, Gastonia, NC, for appellant.
Franklin D. Rozier, Jr., Blackshear, for appellee.
Defendant was charged in two Uniform Traffic Citations with driving with a suspended license and driving with a prohibited bodily alcohol concentration in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391(a)(4). After the trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress, a jury found defendant guilty of the crimes charged. Defendant filed this appeal, challenging the admissibility of the results of her State-administered breath test, and contending the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. We agree that the trial court erroneously admitted the results of defendant's breath test without requiring the State to comply with all of the express and explicit admission requirements of OCGA § 40-6-392(a)(1)(A). And we reverse the denial of defendant's motion to suppress because the arresting officer stopped defendant without specific, articulable facts sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct.
While on early morning patrol on August 6, 1994, Trooper G.W. Rogers of the Georgia State Patrol passed an oncoming Mercedes Benz automobile traveling at a low rate of speed on Georgia Highway 32. Discerning no legitimate reason the old-model Mercedes Benz was traveling "between 25 and 30 miles an hour ..." in a 55--mph speed zone, Trooper Rogers "turned [his patrol car] around on a curve ... and started towards [the] vehicle to observe it a little bit closer...." As the trooper closed in, however, the Mercedes Benz turned off the highway and headed down a dirt road. Trooper Rogers decided not to follow because he did not know whether the driver "lived at [a] residence [on the dirt road] or not." The trooper instead drove until his police cruiser was out of the suspect driver's sight. He then returned to the dirt road and observed the Mercedes Benz turn "back onto 32 [and head] back towards Patterson[, Georgia]." Trooper Rogers again followed the slow moving Mercedes Benz, this time observing "visible exhaust coming from the rear of the vehicle...." Concluding that the suspect driver was "an impaired driver or a burglar[,]" Trooper Rogers stopped the Mercedes Benz and discovered defendant behind the driver's wheel. She smelled like alcohol and was not in possession of a valid driver's license. A subsequent breath test on the State's Intoximeter 3000 machine indicated that defendant had a bodily alcohol content of .15 percent. Held:
1. The trial court erred in admitting the results of defendant's breath test because the State failed to establish that its Intoximeter 3000 machine had all of its electronic and operating components attached and in working order as required by OCGA § 40-6-392(a)(1)(A). State v. Hunter, 221 Ga.App. 837(1), 473 S.E.2d 192, State v. Kampplain, 223 Ga.App. 16, 477 S.E.2d 143 (1996), and Cullen v. State, 223 Ga.App. 356, 477 S.E.2d 620 (1996).
2. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress because Trooper Roger stopped her without specific, articulable facts giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that she was engaged in criminal conduct. We agree.
Although we construe the evidence most favorably to upholding the trial court's findings and judgment, Chastain v. State, 196 Ga.App. 50(1), 395 S.E.2d 570. To this end, we observe that " State v. Jones, 214 Ga.App. 593, 448 S.E.2d 496.
In the case sub judice, Trooper Rogers testified that he stopped defendant because, at 1:20 in the morning, defendant was driving "between 25 and 30 miles an hour ..." in a 55--mph speed zone, defendant turned onto a dirt road when he first began following her, and defendant returned to the highway--driving at a relatively slow rate of speed----after the trooper drove his patrol car...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Semich v. State, A98A1557.
...supra, 167 Ga.App. at 248(3), 305 S.E.2d 913 (weaving and slow speed may reflect intoxication). Compare Raulerson v. State, 223 Ga. App. 556, 557(2), 479 S.E.2d 386 (1996) (stop improper because officer "did not observe defendant weave in the highway ... or otherwise demonstrate that she wa......
-
The People v. Letner
...v. Rincon (Nev. 2006) 147 P.3d 233, 236-237; Richardson v. State (Tex.App. 2000) 39 S.W.3d 634, 640; Raulerson v. State (Ga.Ct.App. 1996) 479 S.E.2d 386, 387; People v. Rotkvich (Ill.App.Ct. 1993) 628 N.E.2d 888, 892; see also United States v. Diaz (5th Cir. 1992) 977 F.2d 163, 165; United ......
-
State v. Rincon
...806, 808 & n. 3. 17. Id. at 1257, 903 P.2d at 808. 18. State v. Brown, 509 N.W.2d 69, 71 (N.D. 1993); see also Raulerson v. State, 223 Ga.App. 556, 479 S.E.2d 386, 387 (1996); Faunce v. State, 884 So.2d 504, 506-07 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 19. Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 250, 111 S.Ct. 1801, ......
-
State v. Bacher
...86, 565 N.E.2d 1271. 15. State v. Rincon (Nev.2006), 147 P.3d 233; Faunce v. State (Fla.App.2004), 884 So.2d 504; Raulerson v. State (1996), 223 Ga.App. 556, 479 S.E.2d 386; State v. Wiese (Iowa 1994), 525 N.W.2d 412, overruled on other grounds in State v. Cline (Iowa 2000), 617 N.W.2d 277;......
-
Search and seizure
...red light for an additional 15 seconds. The court held the ensuing stop was appropriate. Detention held unlawful: Raulerson v. State , 479 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. App. 1996). The court found there was no reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant who was traveling 25 to 30 miles per hour in a 55 ......