Reade v. State, 24907
| Decision Date | 10 January 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 24907,24907 |
| Citation | 236 S.W.2d 798,155 Tex.Crim. 528 |
| Parties | READE v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Fryer & Milstead, El Paso, for appellant.
William E. Clayton, Dist. Atty., William B. Jennings, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
WOODLEY, Commissioner.
About 11:30 o'clock at night, Sortore and Wright, police patrolmen of the city of El Paso, while cruising in a radio controlled police car, noticed five Mexican boys in front of a grocery store. Two of the boys were playing guitars; the other three were singing. After circling the block, the police drove back to the store to investigate. In the meantime, the guitar players had left and at the arrival of the officers there were present only Salvador Aldana, Frank Reade (appellant), and George Gomez. The policemen got out of their car and asked the boys where they lived. Gomez told them he lived just across the street, and then left to go home. The policemen asked appellant (Reade) where he lived and, according to the testimony of the patrolmen, he gave an indefinite answer in what they termed a 'snotty way.'
The officers decided to arrest appellant and to take him to the 'station and let the captain talk to him.' Whereupon, Policeman Sortore took hold of appellant to put him in the car and appellant jerked away from him. Seeing that appellant was resisting arrest and for the purpose of helping Sortore, Officer Wright went to his assistance. From its holster, Aldana then grabbed Wright's pistol from his person and fired one shot into Wright's body, knocking him down. Seeing this, Sortore drew his pistol and, as he did so, Aldana shot him four times, one shot striking the hand in which he was holding his pistol and rendering him unable to fire it. The two boys fled from the scene.
Appellant was shortly thereafter arrested at his home upon a charge of shooting the officers and then was taken to the police station. Returning with the officers to his home, appellant produced from its hiding place in a sand pile in his yard Wright's pistol, with which Aldana had done the shooting. The officer having appellant in custody testified, without objection, that at that time appellant said 'that Salvador Aldana had given him the gun and that he had taken it and hidden it at the place where he dug it up.'
It is upon this testimony the appellant stands here convicted of the misdemeanor offense of receiving and concealing the pistol which Aldana had stolen. The punishment was assessed at confinement in jail for a term of six months.
Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, stated that he took the weapon from...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Bahta
...he received it); see also Williams v. State, 154 S.W.2d 809 (Ark. 1941); State v. Lisena, 30 A.2d 593 (N.J. 1943); Reade v. State, 236 S.W.2d 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951). The respondent raises two additional constitutional arguments, to "preserve them, if necessary, for C. Discussion The iss......
-
In re Bahta
...he received it); see also Williams v. State, 154 S.W.2d 809 (Ark. 1941); State v. Lisena, 30 A.2d 593 (N.J. 1943); Reade v. State, 236 S.W.2d 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951). The respondent raises two additional constitutional arguments, to "preserve them, if necessary, for C. Discussion The iss......
- Nichols v. State