Rehberger v. State

Citation502 S.E.2d 222,269 Ga. 576
Decision Date06 July 1998
Docket Number No. S98A0623, No. S97Y1384.
PartiesREHBERGER v. The STATE. In the Matter of Robert L. REHBERGER.
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Alexander J. Repasky, Marietta, for Robert L. Rehberger.

Thomas R. McBerry, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tommy Kenneth Floyd, Dist. Atty., McDonough, for the State.

William P. Smith, III, General Counsel, E. Duane Cooper, Asst. General Counsel, State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta, for State Bar of Georgia.

PER CURIAM.

The Superior Court of Henry County disbarred Robert L. Rehberger, a member of the State Bar of Georgia, after he was convicted in that court on one count of the felony of false imprisonment, OCGA § 16-5-41 (see OCGA § 16-1-3(2)(5)); one count of sexual battery, a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature, OCGA § 16-6-22.1; and one count of battery, a misdemeanor. OCGA § 16-5-23.1. Rehberger filed a motion for new trial from the criminal conviction, which remains pending below, and timely filed a notice of appeal from the disbarment order, which was docketed in this Court as Case No. S98A0623. Pursuant to In the Matter of Nave, 258 Ga. 377, 369 S.E.2d 901 (1988), a copy of Rehberger's disbarment order was forwarded to this Court for confirmation purposes and docketed as Case No. S97Y1384.

1. A superior court judge has the power to disbar an attorney based upon his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. Standard 66, Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia; In the Matter of Nave, 254 Ga. 107(1), 326 S.E.2d 769 (1985). In Georgia, all felonies are crimes involving moral turpitude. Lewis v. State, 243 Ga. 443, 445, 254 S.E.2d 830 (1979). Although we deem it to be the better practice for superior courts, when dealing with an attorney who has been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, to suspend the attorney from the practice of law during the pendency of any post-conviction proceedings rather than disbar the attorney, a superior court does not exceed its authority when it disbars such an attorney prior to the exhaustion of all post-conviction remedies.1 Accordingly, we find no merit in Rehberger's contention that the trial court was not authorized to disbar him.

2. An attorney licensed to practice law in Georgia who is legally charged and convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude and then disbarred under Standard 66 has been properly afforded due process of law under Art. I, Sec. I, Par. I, Ga. Const. (1983).

3. Rehberger...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • In re Calhoun
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 7 Novembre 2023
    ... ... "Rules"), of Special Master LaRae Dixon Moore, who ... recommends that W. McCall Calhoun, Jr. (State Bar No ... 103915), a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1990, be ... suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of ... crime that "all felonies are crimes involving moral ... turpitude." Rehberger v. State , 269 Ga. 576, ... 576 (502 S.E.2d 222) (1998). Accordingly, suspending Calhoun ... pending the outcome of his appeal does not ... ...
  • Spillers v. Crawford Cnty.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Georgia
    • 28 Novembre 2011
    ...State, 299 Ga. App. 854, 683 S.E. 2d 903 (2009). 2. In Georgia, all felonies are crimes involving moral turpitude. Rehberger v. State, 269 Ga. 576, 502 S.E. 2d 222 (1998). 3. Spillers' complaint does not state with clarity whether he was elected in 2000. It can be inferred from the complain......
  • Rehberger v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 18 Dicembre 1998
    ...862, 506 S.E.2d 870 (1998). 12. 269 Ga. 763, 505 S.E.2d 1 (1998). 13. 215 Ga.App. 120(2), 449 S.E.2d 667 (1994). 14. Rehberger v. State, 269 Ga. 576, 502 S.E.2d 222 (1998). ...
  • Peak v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 Gennaio 2015
    ...512 S.E.2d 892 (1999). All felonies were considered crimes involving moral turpitude, as were certain misdemeanors. Rehberger v. State, 269 Ga. 576(1), 502 S.E.2d 222 (1998).In 2005, new legislation tracked the language of Rule 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and the new statute diffe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT