Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay

Citation102 S.E.2d 492,214 Ga. 2
Decision Date07 March 1958
Docket NumberNo. 19965,19965
PartiesRESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Willie T. GAY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Eugene M. Kerr, Augusta, for plaintiff in error.

Randall Evans, Jr., Thomson, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

MOBLEY, Justice.

This case is here on the grant of a petition for certiorari in Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay, 96 Ga.App. 601, 101 S.E.2d 158. The plaintiff had brought an action under an insurance policy seeking to recover $200 hospital expenses, $260 medical bills, $8.50 ambulance bill, $400 attorney's fees, the statutory penalty of 25%, and interest, making a total of $995.19. The jury returned a verdict in his favor for $800. The Court of Appeals held that, under the evidence, the plaintiff was entitled to recover only $141 under the policy, and held that the evidence supported a recovery of $400 attorney's fees and interest, and affirmed the judgment of the trial court in denying the defendant's motion for new trial provided the plaintiff write off the amount of the verdict in excess of the $141 recoverable under the policy and $400 attorney's fees, and interest. The only exception in this court is to the decision of the Court of Appeals in affirming the judgment of the trial court provided the plaintiff write off from the verdict all amounts in excess of $141 principal, $400 attorney's fees, and interest. The defendant denied that the plaintiff was entitled to any attorney's fees. The effect of the ruling of the Court of Appeals was to allow the plaintiff to recover $400 attorney's fees when it is impossible from the verdict to determine what amount the jury allowed as attorney's fees. While there was evidence that would have supported a finding of $400 for attorney's fees, the evidence did not demand such a finding. 'Jurors, in passing upon the testimony of an expert witness as to the value of professional services, are not absolutely bound by his opinion, but may exercise their own judgment on the subject, taking into consideration the nature of the services, the time required to perform them, and all the attending circumstances. 2. Accordingly, where an attorney at law was the only witness as to the value of certain services rendered by himself, and testified that they were, in his opinion, worth a stated amount, the jury, had the matter been submitted to them, would not have been constrained to accept this opinion as absolutely correct, but might have found that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Drug Emporium, Inc. v. Peaks, A97A0710
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1997
    ...Peaks. Therefore, the verdict and judgment are tainted and the judgment on punitive damages must be reversed. Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay, 214 Ga. 2, 3, 102 S.E.2d 492; Eastern Foods v. Forman, 202 Ga.App. 347, 348, 415 S.E.2d 1. Compare Mock v. Wrigley, 178 Ga.App. 660, 661, 344 S.E.2d (c......
  • Department of Transp. v. Driggers, 57424
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1979
    ...Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works, 105 Ga. 225, 227, 31 S.E. 426; McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282(2), 73 S.E. 493; Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay, 214 Ga. 2, 3, 102 S.E.2d 492; Ginn v. Morgan, 225 Ga. 192, 193, 167 S.E.2d Later, this court added a proviso in Hogan v. Olivera, 141 Ga.App. 399......
  • Merritt v. Department of Transp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 28, 1978
    ...law concerning attorney fees allowable in such cases, and further in view of the Supreme Court's holding in Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay, 214 Ga. 2, 3, 102 S.E.2d 492, that appellate courts are without authority to fix compensation of an attorney in any case, we are . . . bound by the 'any ......
  • Hogan v. Olivera, 52664
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 24, 1977
    ...palpably unreasonable under all the evidence. Garner v. Gwinnett County, 105 Ga.App. 714(5), 719, 125 S.E.2d 563; Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay, 214 Ga. 2, 3, 102 S.E.2d 492; Palmer v. Howse, 133 Ga.App. 619, 620(1), 212 S.E.2d Jurors are not absolutely bound to accept as correct the opinion......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT