Respole v. Schorr

Decision Date08 February 1966
CitationRespole v. Schorr, 266 N.Y.S.2d 863, 25 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
PartiesClaim of Florence RESPOLE, Respondent, v. Max SCHORR et al., Appellants, Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Bernard F. Farley, New York City, for appellants.

Jacowitz & Bardack, Brooklyn, for claimant-respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., for Workmen's Compensation Bd., (Daniel Polansky and Harry Rackow, Asst. Attys.Gen., of counsel).

Before GIBSON, P. J., and HERLIHY, REYNOLDS, TAYLOR and AULISI, JJ.

HERLIHY, Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the board which determined that at that time of the accident the claimant was within her employment.

The claimant was a secretary in the employer's law office and was requested to go to a law office and secure a case file, similar errands having been requested of her on prior occasions.Her regular working hours were from 9:30 a. m. to 5:30 p. m. and it was her practice to leave her home at Bayside, Long Island, about 8:30 a. m. On the day of the accident she left earlier, having made arrangements with the law office to pick up the file.While on her way to perform the errand and likewise to go to work, in descending the stairs to the subway she fell and sustained injuries.Her employer in his report to the board stated that the accident happened while the claimant was on her way to pick up a file and so testified at the hearing.A lawyer from the law office corroborated the claimant's testimony.

On this uncontroverted evidence, the board found 'that claimant's trip on the morning of the day of the accident had a dual purpose; she was not only on her way to work but, while enroute, was to stop at the office or [sic] her employer's association counsel, as per her employer's instructions, to pick up a case file and bring it back to the office.Under the circumstances, the Board finds that the accidental injury sustained arose out of and in the course of employment'.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Ricciardi v. Aniero Concrete Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1973
    ...926), or where the employee has been directed to perform a 'special errand' for his employer on his way to work. (Matter of Respole v. Schorr, 25 A.D.2d 581, 266 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Charak v. Leddy, 23 A.D.2d 437, 261 N.Y.S.2d 486; Matter of Mason v. New York Abstract Co., 11 A.D.2d 569......
  • Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 27, 1995
    ...438, 261 N.Y.S.2d 486; see also, Matter of Weinstein v. 16 E. 58th St. Corp., 92 A.D.2d 678, 460 N.Y.S.2d 201; Matter of Respole v. Schorr, 25 A.D.2d 581, 266 N.Y.S.2d 863; cf., Matter of Oehley v. Syracuse Boys Club, 151 A.D.2d 825, 542 N.Y.S.2d 799). The premise of the rule is that the er......
  • Costa v. New York State Workmen's Compensation Bd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 2, 1970
    ...926), or where the employee has been directed to perform a 'special errand' for his employer on his way to work. (Matter of Respole v. Schorr, 25 A.D.2d 581, 266 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Charak v. Leddy, 23 A.D.2d 437, 261 N.Y.S.2d 486; Matter of Mason v. New York Abstract Co., 11 A.D.2d 569......
  • O'Rourke v. Manuet Restaurant, Ivy House
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 29, 1973
    ...is entitled to compensation if injured during that trip, even if there is no deviation from the normal route (Matter of Respole v. Schorr, 25 A.D.2d 581, 266 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Mayer v. All Electronics, 1 A.D.2d 715, 146 N.Y.S.2d 793), a trip is not transformed into an employment erran......
  • Get Started for Free