Ress v. X-Tra Super Food Centers, Inc., X-TRA

Citation616 So.2d 110
Decision Date24 March 1993
Docket NumberNo. 91-2312,X-TRA,91-2312
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D794 Joan RESS, et al., Appellants, v.SUPER FOOD CENTERS, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Steven R. Berger of Wolpe, Leibowitz, Berger & Brotman and Nuell, Baron & Polsky, Miami, for appellants.

Mark R. Antonelli of Gaebe, Murphy, Mullen, Antonelli & Gerlin, Coral Gables, for appellee.

DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge.

Appellants, Joan and William Ress, appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in a slip and fall case which they filed against appellee, X-tra Super Food Centers, Inc.

While walking through an aisle of X-tra's super market, Joan Ress stepped on a substance on the floor which appeared to be sauerkraut and fell, injuring herself. Joan had been in that particular aisle for at least five minutes, during which time no one passed her. Prior to the time that she slipped and fell she had been looking up at a "huge display" of paper towels which reached "up to the rafters." Joan testified in a deposition that the substance she fell on looked like sauerkraut and it was "gunky, dirty and wet and black." The deposition evidence further showed that the store sold hot dogs to customers for consumption on the premises. There were condiments and customers could request sauerkraut. Customers were free to either sit on the benches near the area where the hot dogs were sold or walk around the store while consuming hot dogs.

Joan and William sued for damages based upon X-tra's negligence in allowing the aforesaid condition to exist. In due course X-tra filed a motion for summary judgment, the thrust of which contended that there was no genuine issue of material fact existing because there was no proof that X-tra actually or constructively knew of the presence on the floor of the substance causing Joan's fall. It is conceded there was no actual notice; the issue presented is whether X-tra had constructive notice of the condition.

On the record presented to the trial court we conclude that X-tra did not successfully carry its burden of conclusively demonstrating that there was no existing genuine issue of material fact. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Cufferi v. Royal Palm Development Co., Inc., 516 So.2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Suggs v. Allen, 563 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

The pleadings, depositions and other matters contained in the record show that the substance which caused Joan to slip and fall, a substance she perceived to be sauerkraut, had been there for at least five minutes. Furthermore, the substance was black which could lead one to conclude that it had been stepped on before and thus had been there for longer than the five minutes Joan...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 15, 2001
    ...substance described as "very dirty," "trampled," "containing skid marks, scuff marks," and "chewed up"); Ress v. X-tra Super Food Ctrs., Inc., 616 So.2d 110, 110-11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (substance that appeared to be sauerkraut was "gunky, dirty and wet and black"); Hodges v. Walsh, 553 So.2......
  • Grier v. Metropolitan Dade County
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 8, 1995
    ...condition in existence for anything like this two-year period was undiscoverable as a matter of law. See Ress v. X-tra Super Food Centers, Inc., 616 So.2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (presence of sauerkraut on supermarket floor for five minutes or more raises issue of constructive notice); Winn......
  • Hussain v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 5D99-1701.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 23, 2000
    ...631 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 621 So.2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Ress v. X-tra Super Food Centers, Inc., 616 So.2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Washington v. Pic-N-Pay Supermarket, Inc., 453 So.2d 508 (Fla. 4th DCA Winn Dixie's assistant manager and store ......
  • Greenleaf v. Amerada Hess Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 1993
    ...as to the critical question of constructive or actual notice. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Ress v. X-Tra Super Food Centers, Inc., 616 So.2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). While there was a dispute as to how long the dangerous condition existed, the fact that an employee may be able......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT