Richenbacher v. California Packing Corp.
Decision Date | 31 October 1924 |
Citation | 145 N.E. 281,250 Mass. 198 |
Parties | RICHENBACHER v. CALIFORNIA PACKING CORPORATION. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Exceptions from Superior Court, Worcester County; T. Hammond, Judge.
Action of tort by Grace R. Richenbacher against the California Packing Corporation for damages from biting a piece of glass while eating spinach. Findings for plaintiff, and defendant brings exceptions. Exceptions overruled.
M. M. Yaylor, of Worcester, for plaintiff.
C. M. Thayer, of Worcester, for defendant.
This is an action of tort to recover damages caused to the plaintiff by biting upon a piece of glass while eating spinach. The spinach had been taken from a can purchased from a retailer, who had purchased it from a wholesale grocer to whom it had been sold by the defendant.
The declaration was in two counts; the first alleging a misrepresentation by the defendant, and the second alleging negligence of the defendant in that it ‘carelessly and negligently allowed and put within and concealed within the can of spinach a piece or pieces of glass.’ At the close of the evidence, which the bill of exceptions does not state is fully reported, the defendant moved for a directed ‘verdict’ on the first count. This motion was allowed and no exception appears to have been taken thereto. The defendant then moved for a directed ‘verdict’ on the second count. This motion was denied; the defendant excepted to its disallowance and the presiding judge found for the plaintiff and made a ‘Statement of Findings and Rulings' in part as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quinn v. Swift & Co.
...231 Mass. 90, 120 N.E. 225, 5 A.L.R. 242; Tonsman v. Greenglass (1924) 248 Mass. 275, 142 N.E. 756; Richenbacher v. California Packing Corporation (1924) 250 Mass. 198, 145 N.E. 281; Sullivan v. Manhattan Market Co. (1925) 251 Mass. 395, 146 N.E. 673; Doyle v. Continental Baking Co. (1928) ......
-
Reichert Milling Co. v. George
... ... manufacturing, preparing, or packing a certain brand of ... flour, and which, after being prepared and packed ... sealed packages. Richenbacher v. California Packing ... Corp. [250 Mass. 198, 145 N.E. 281], supra ... ...
-
Arena v. John P. Squire Co.
...Pacific Tea Co., 231 Mass. 90, 120 N.E. 225, 5 A.L.R. 242;Tonsman v. Greenglass, 248 Mass. 275, 142 N.E. 756;Richenbacher v. California Packing Corp., 250 Mass. 198, 145 N.E. 281;Doyle v. Continental Baking Co., 262 Mass. 516, 160 N.E. 325;O'Brien v. Louis K. Liggett Co., 282 Mass. 438, 185......
-
Minutilla v. Providence Ice Cream Co.
...that of poisonous drugs and patent medicines, the safe compounding of which is demanded by public policy, Richenbacher v. California Packing Corporation, 250 Mass. 198, 145 N. E. 281; Bishop v. Weber, 139 Mass. 411, 1 N. E. 154, 52 Am. Rep. 715, others have found a privity of contract betwe......