Rio Grande Western Railway Company v. Thomas Stringham
Decision Date | 01 November 1915 |
Docket Number | Nos. 4 and 5,s. 4 and 5 |
Citation | 239 U.S. 44,60 L.Ed. 136,36 S.Ct. 5 |
Parties | RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. THOMAS B. STRINGHAM et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Waldemar Van Cott, E. M. Allison, Jr., and William D. Riter for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendants in error.
This was a suit to quiet the title to a strip of land claimed and used by the plaintiff as a railroad right of way under the act of March 3, 1875, chap. 152, 18 Stat. at L. 482, Comp. Stat. 1913, § 4921, and to which the defendants asserted title under a patent for a placer mining claim. At the trial the facts were specially found and judgment for the defendants was entered upon the findings. In reviewing that judgment, the supreme court of the state, accepting the findings below, held that the plaintiff, in virtue of proceedings had in the Land Department under the right-of-way act while the land was yet public, acquired a right of way 200 feet wide through the lands afterwards embranced in the mining claim, and that the defendants' title under the placer patent was subject to this right of way, and thereupon reversed the judgment and remanded the case with a direction to 'enter a judgment awarding to the plaintiff title to a right of way over the lands in question 100 feet wide on each side of the center of the track.' 38 Utah, 113, 110 Pac. 868. Acting upon this direction, the trial court vacated its prior judgment and entered another, adjudging the plaintiff to be 'the owner of a right of way' through the mining claim 100 feet wide on each side of the center line of the railroad, declaring the plaintiff's title to such right of way good and valid, and enjoining the defendants from asserting any claim whatever to the premises, or any part thereof, adverse to the plaintiff's 'said right of way.' The plaintiff again appealed, insisting that it was only adjudged to be the owner of a right of way when, according to the true effect of the right-of-way act, it had a title in fee simple, as was asserted in its complaint. But the judgment was affirmed, the court saying (39 Utah, 236, 115 Pac. 967):
Being in doubt which of the judgments of the appellate court should be brought here for review to present properly the question respecting the nature of its title, the plaintiff concluded to bring up both, each by a separate writ of error.
Manifestly the first judgment was final within the meaning of Judicial Code, § 237 [36 Stat. at L. 1156, chap. 231, Comp. Stat. 1913, § 1214]. It disposed of the whole case on the merits, directed what judgment should be entered, and left nothing to the judicial discretion of the trial court. Tippecanoe County v. Lucas, 93 U. S. 108, 23 L. ed. 822; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 27 L. ed. 73, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15; Mower v. Fletcher, 114 U. S. 127, 29 L. ed. 117, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 799; Chesapeake & P....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Southern Pac. Transp. Co.
...railroads constructed before 1875. Rio Grande W. Ry. v. Stringham, 38 Utah 113, 119-20, 110 P. 868, 870-71 (1910), aff'd, 239 U.S. 44, 36 S.Ct. 5, 60 L.Ed. 136 (1915). That decision, however, was based on an inferred contemporaneous interpretation of the Act by the Secretary of the Interior......
-
Great Northern Ry Co v. United States
...of Appeals affirmed. 9 Cir., 119 F.2d 821. The importance of the question and an asserted conflict with Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Stringham, 239 U.S. 44, 36 S.Ct. 5, 60 L.Ed. 136, moved us to grant certiorari. 314 U.S. 596, 62 S.Ct. 69, 86 L.Ed. The Act of March 3, 1875, from which petit......
-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Board of Bond Trustees of Special Road and Bridge Dist. No. 1 of Alachua County
... ... the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company against the Board of ... Bond Trustees ... Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Western ... Stockyards Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 151 S.W ... C.) 257 F ... 450; Lewis v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co., 17 Utah, ... 504, 54 P. 981; ... Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Stringham, 239 U.S. 44, ... 36 S.Ct. 5, 60 L.Ed. 136; ... ...
-
Home On the Range v. At&T Corp.
...reversionary interest in the right of way, which was consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Rio Grande Western Ry. Co. v. Stringham, 239 U.S. 44, 36 S.Ct. 5, 60 L.Ed. 136 (1915), which described rights of way under the 1875 Act as limited fee interests, as Townsend had described ri......