Ripple's of Clearview, Inc. v. Le Havre Associates

Decision Date21 December 1981
Citation85 A.D.2d 660,445 N.Y.S.2d 219
PartiesRIPPLE'S OF CLEARVIEW, INC., Appellant, v. LE HAVRE ASSOCIATES, a New York Partnership, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Carb, Luria, Glassner, Cook & Kufeld, New York City (M. William Scherer, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Dreyer & Traub, New York City (Richard E. Hershenson, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Before MOLLEN, P. J., and LAZER, COHALAN and THOMPSON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring plaintiff's rights under a sublease and to recover money damages (which was consolidated with a holdover proceeding commenced by defendant), plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, 111 Misc.2d 263, 443 N.Y.S.2d 824, Queens County, dated November 6, 1981, which granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's demand for a jury trial of specified issues.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiff's affirmation of the existence of the sublease prohibits it from repudiating the provision in that sublease in which it waives its right to a jury trial (see Leav v. Weitzner, 268 App.Div. 466, 468, 51 N.Y.S.2d 775). Furthermore, the jury waiver provision in the sublease remains applicable to the subsequent statutory holdover tenancy (see Lera Realty Co. v. Rich, 273 App.Div. 913, 77 N.Y.S.2d 658; Jamaica Investors v. Blacharsh, 193 Misc. 949, 87 N.Y.S.2d 807, mot. for lv. to app. den. 277 App.Div. 951, 99 N.Y.S.2d 755). We do not reach appellant's remaining contentions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Forrest v. Fuchs
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 9 Octubre 1984
    ...has been so construed (Ripple's of Clearview v. Le Havre Associates, 111 Misc.2d 263, 443 N.Y.S.2d 824, affd. on other grounds 85 A.D.2d 660, 445 N.Y.S.2d 219). However, the Advisory Committee (on the CPLR) in its notes states that CPLR 4102(c) "insures the continuation of the former rule t......
  • O'Brien v. Moszynski
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Mayo 1984
    ...and repudiate a provision contained therein to the effect that the right to a trial by jury is waived (see Ripple's of Clearview v. Le Havre Assoc., 85 A.D.2d 660, 445 N.Y.S.2d 219; Fay's Drug Co. of Riverside v. P & C Prop. Co-op., 51 A.D.2d 887, 380 N.Y.S.2d 398; Leav v. Weitzner, 268 App......
  • Penale v. County of Niagara
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Febrero 1991
    ...255 App.Div. 374, 7 N.Y.S.2d 665; Ripple's of Clearview, Inc. v. LeHavre Assoc., 111 Misc.2d 263, 264, 443 N.Y.S.2d 824, affd 85 A.D.2d 660, 445 N.Y.S.2d 219). Addressing the merits, we conclude that the judgment must be reversed because petitioner did not establish that respondents acted i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT