Ritchie v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 5415
Citation | 521 S.W.2d 367 |
Decision Date | 20 March 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 5415,5415 |
Parties | Johnnie E. RITCHIE et al., Appellants, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Randy Taylor, Dallas, for appellants.
Golden, Potts, Boeckman & Wilson, Dallas, for appellee.
This is an appeal from summary judgment that plaintiffs take nothing, in a suit on an insurance policy, for medical benefits, allegedly caused by an accidental injury.
Plaintiffs Ritchie, stepfather and mother of Douglas Robinson, sued defendant Insurance Company on an insurance policy, for medical benefits incurred by Robinson as a result of gunshot wounds.
Defendant answered that the policy did not cover the expenses sued for because such were incurred by Robinson as a result of an injury which was not accidental.
Defendant moved for summary judgment that plaintiffs take nothing asserting the expenses for which plaintiffs sued were incurred as the result of an injury which was not accidental, and therefore not covered by the policy.
The trial court granted such motion and rendered summary judgment that plaintiffs take nothing.
Plaintiffs appeal on 4 points contending the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in that the record raised an issue of fact as to whether or not the injuries sustained by Douglas Robinson were from his viewpoint accidental.
The insurance policy insured Robinson for medical expenses incurred as the result of accidental injury. On the night of August 12, 1972 Douglas Robinson, sustained injuries as a result of a gunshot wound, after the commission of a crime, to which he later plead guilty.
During the night of August 12, 1972 Robinson and another broke into a truck owned by and located at the Arcadia Transfer and Storage Company. Robinson was standing beside the truck and his friend was inside when Richard Thomas yelled at them 'Get out in the open, I have a gun'. Robinson and his friend began running away whereupon Thomas began shooting. After several shots were fired Robinson was struck by a bullet.
Plaintiffs can recover only if te injuries sustained by Robinson were accidental. Injuries are accidental when they cannot reasonably be anticipated as the result of the actions of the person injured. Spencer v. Southland Life Ins. Co., CCA, Ft. Worth, Er. Refused, 340 S.W.2d 335. Conversely, when one should in all reasonable probability, expect events to result from...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Heyward
...Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. Sumner, 464 S.W.2d 212 (Tex.Civ.App.--Tyler 1971, writ ref'd, n.r.e.); Ritchie v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 521 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, no writ). Under the Hutcherson test, Bennie Heyward's death might be accidental even tho......
-
Freeman v. Crown Life Ins. Co.
...engaged in the commission of serious crimes are not accidental within the meaning of insurance policies. See Ritchie v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 521 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.Civ.App.Waco 1975, no writ); Spencer v. Southland Life Insurance Company, 340 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App.Fort Wort......
-
Valley Dental Ass'n, P.C. v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.
...So.2d 1210 (Fla.1978); Carlyle v. Equity Benefit Life Insurance Co., 551 P.2d 663, 667 (Okla.App.1976); Ritchie v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 521 S.W.2d 367, 368 (Tex.Civ.App.1975); Henry v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 70 Ill.App.2d 132, 217 N.E.2d 482, 486 (1966); Perringer v. M......
-
Lockett v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
...who commits an act which can be reasonably interpreted as posing a threat to a peace officer is not accidental. Ritchie v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 521 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1975, no writ); Spencer v. Southland Life Ins. Co., 340 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1960,......