Robbins v. State
| Decision Date | 23 July 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-2554,89-2554 |
| Citation | 564 So.2d 256 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D1892 John Anderson ROBBINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Richard Dugger, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; William H. Anderson, Judge.
John Anderson Robbins, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.
Habeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals on issues which were raised or should have been raised on appeal or could have been challenged pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850; White v. Duggar, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla.1987). The issues raised by appellant were adequately addressed by this court in Robbins v. State, 370 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Defendant is procedurally barred from seeking further relief by failing to meet the time constraints enumerated in Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.
Appellees request for certification is denied.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Freeze v. Sec'y, Dep't of Children & Families
...DCA 2010) (citing Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992); Mills v. Bugger, 51A So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1990); Robbins v. State, 564 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)). Thus, this claim is procedurally defaulted because it was not raised in a procedurally correct manner in state court. S......
-
Zuluaga v. State, Dept. of Corrections
...proceedings. Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla.1992); Mills v. Dugger, 574 So.2d 63 (Fla.1990); Robbins v. State, 564 So.2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA The trial court did not err in failing to treat the petition for writ of habeas corpus as a postconviction motion to correct sentence. Ge......
-
Delancy v. Tucker
...511 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla.1987); Zuluaga v. State, Dep't of Corrections, 32 So.3d 674, 676–77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Robbins v. State, 564 So.2d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Assuming arguendo, as the trial court did, that Appellant's petition could be deemed a rule 3.850 motion, the court corr......
-
Patterson v. State, 94-1792
...have been raised on appeal or could have been challenged pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Robbins v. State, 564 So.2d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). It has been held that Rule 3 (3.850 motions) completely superseded habeas corpus as the means of collateral attack of a ju......