Robidoux v. State, 80-2074
| Decision Date | 28 October 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-2074,80-2074 |
| Citation | 405 So.2d 267 |
| Parties | Benjamin H. ROBIDOUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Russell S. Bohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Prior to trial appellant took the discovery deposition of the victim of the crime with which appellant was charged. At trial the court admitted into evidence over appellant's objection, the victim's deposition because the victim was then deceased.
Appellant raises several points on appeal including the propriety of the admission of said deposition. Although none of the other points has merit we hold the admission of the victim's discovery deposition was reversible error. State v. Basiliere, 353 So.2d 820 (Fla.1977); State v. James, 402 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1981).
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from are reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Clark v. State, s. 89-1503
...DCA 1986); Jackson v. State, 453 So.2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Terrell v. State, 407 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Robidoux v. State, 405 So.2d 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The admission of Knight's deposition in this case was error. However, defense counsel failed to raise the proper object......