Robinson v. McNeill

• Decision Date: 03 December 1897
• Citation: 51 P. 355,18 Wash. 163
• Parties: ROBINSON v. MCNEILL.
• Court: Washington Supreme Court

51 P. 355

18 Wash. 163

ROBINSON v. MCNEILL.

Supreme Court of Washington

December 3, 1897

Appeal from superior court, Whitman county; E. H. Sullivan, Judge.

Action by John Walter Robinson, an infant, by Hugh M. Robinson, as guardian ad litem, against E. McNeill, as receiver of the Oregon Railway & Navigation Company, a corporation, and as receiver of the Oregon Railway Extension Company, a corporation. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

M. O. Reed, for appellant.

Cox, Cotton, Teal & Minor, for respondent.

SCOTT, C.J.

This action was brought to recover damages sustained by John Walter Robinson, caused by falling from a hand car under the general control of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of nonsuit.

From the plaintiff's showing it appears that he, with a number of other boys, had obtained the loan of the hand car from the section foreman, who had control of it for the purpose of enabling him to discharge his duties in repairing the track, etc. The boys had obtained the car for the purpose of going along the track to a swimming place, a mile or more distant, and on the way there the plaintiff fell off, and was injured. It will be observed that the action was not founded upon any negligent or wrongful act of the defendant's servant in allowing the car to remain exposed and unsecure, so that boys of immature years might be tempted to use it; and also that the car was not being used, at that particular time, in the company's business. It was not shown nor claimed that the section foreman had any authority to loan the car at all, and in fact it may be fairly assumed from the record that it was a violation of his duties to loan it. His act in so doing was entirely outside of and exceeded the scope of his employment. This being so, under the great weight of the authorities the defendant was not liable for his wrongful act, and the nonsuit was properly granted. Affirmed.

ANDERS, REAVIS, DUNBAR, and GORDON, JJ., concur.