Rockdale County School Dist. v. Weil
| Decision Date | 07 May 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 35821,35821 |
| Citation | 245 Ga. 730,266 S.E.2d 919 |
| Parties | ROCKDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. WEIL. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Vaughn & Barksdale, Clarence R. Vaughn, Jr., Conyers, Weekes, Candler Sams & Weatherly, Gary M. Sams, R. Phillip Shinall, III, Decatur, for appellants.
George H. Connell, Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.
This appeal is from an order of Rockdale Superior Court denying appellant's motion to dismiss and motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order. Appellant is the Rockdale County Board of Education and its members.
In April, 1979, appellee Joseph H. Weil, Jr. entered into an employment contract with the appellant school board for a period of time from July 1, 1979, until June 30, 1980, which contract provided that Weil was assigned to duty at J. H. House School in Conyers, Georgia, "but the employer reserves the right to effect a transfer at any time to any school under the jurisdiction of the employer." Weil served as principal at J. H. House School from 1971, until August, 1979, by virtue of successive annual contracts.
On August 2, 1979, a meeting of the school board convened and agreed to transfer Weil from J. H. House School to coordinator of a new alternative school program within the system, with a salary increase of $500 per annum. As principal of J. H. House School, Weil was responsible for the supervision and training of several hundred students, exercised managerial authority over 64 employees and was directly responsible to the superintendent of schools. In the position of coordinator of the alternative school program, Weil would be responsible for the supervision and training of approximately 20 students, would exercise managerial authority over only one employee and would report to one of the superintendent's subordinates.
When Weil learned of the transfer, he objected and requested a hearing. A hearing was scheduled for August 14, 1979, at which time Weil presented sworn testimony in support of his objections. The school board took the position that because the transfer was not a demotion, Weil was not entitled to a formal due process hearing and accordingly presented no sworn testimony or evidence. After hearing Weil's evidence, the school board refused to reconsider its actions and rendered its final determination.
Weil filed a petition for certiorari in Rockdale Superior Court alleging that the school board failed to comply with the procedures for demotion set forth in Code Ann. § 32-2101c et seq. He prayed that he be given an opportunity to demonstrate that his demotion was improper, illegal and without just cause. He prayed that he be allowed to continue as principal of J. H. House School and that the school board be restrained from filling the vacancy at J. H. House School until the matter could be finally determined by the court.
The court heard Weil's petition, and found that the action taken on August 2, 1979, by the school board amounted to a marked diminution in the responsibility and prestige of Weil, and accordingly constituted a demotion. Holding that any reassignment which involves a diminution of responsibility, prestige and/or salary is a demotion and cannot be effected by a local school board without holding a due process hearing pursuant to Code Ann. § 32-2101c, the trial court declared the action taken by the school board to be illegal and of no force and effect. It ordered that the school board could remove Weil from his position as principal only by following the procedures set out in Code Ann. § 32-2101c. It enjoined the appellants from taking any action to prevent Weil from performing his contracted for duties as principal of J. H. House School and from appointing or allowing any other individual to fill the position. Appellants' subsequent motion to dismiss and motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order were denied. We reverse the denial of the motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order.
1. Appellee had the right under the circumstances of this case to elect to proceed by writ of certiorari to the superior court or appeal to the State Board of Education as provided in Code Ann. § 32-910. "The remedy of certiorari from a judicial decision of a county board of education is available directly to ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hatcher v. Board of Public Educ. and Orphanage for Bibb County
...position in the school system having less responsibility, prestige, and salary." (emphasis added). See Rockdale County School Dist. v. Weil, 245 Ga. 730, 266 S.E.2d 919 (1980). The media specialist/librarian position was a position in the school system having less responsibility, prestige, ......
-
Brewer v. Purvis
...Plaintiff is alleging that the agency exceeded its authority. 62 The authority on which Plaintiff relies, Rockdale County School Dist. v. Weil, 245 Ga. 730, 266 S.E.2d 919 (1980) and Ellis-Adams v. Whitfield County Bd. of Educ., 182 Ga.App. 463, 356 S.E.2d 219 (1987), do not stand for the p......
-
Siler v. Hancock County Bd. of Educ.
...must have "less responsibility, prestige, and salary." O.C.G.A. § 20-2-943(a)(2)(C) (emphasis added); see Rockdale County Sch. Dist. v. Weil, 245 Ga. 730, 266 S.E.2d 919, 921 (1980). Thus, before proceeding any further, the Court must decide whether the alternative school position to which ......
-
King v. Board of Educ. of City of Buford, s. A94A0857
...or demotion of teachers, principals and other employees having contracts for a definite term." Rockdale County School District v. Weil, 245 Ga. 730, 732(2), 266 S.E.2d 919 (1980). King essentially contends that the Board's decision not to reassign her as the school's "band director" after h......
-
Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...265 Ga. at 304, 455 S.E.2d at 23. The court relied upon O.C.G.A. Sec. 20-2-943(a)(2)(C) (1992), and Rockdale County School Dist. v. Weil, 245 Ga. 730, 266 S.E.2d 919 (1980). 265 Ga. at 304, 455 S.E.2d at 23. 221. 265 Ga. at 304, 455 S.E.2d at 23. The court noted the record to support findin......