Rodford v. Sample
| Decision Date | 20 May 1968 |
| Citation | 30 A.D.2d 588,290 N.Y.S.2d 30 |
| Parties | Mary Lou RODFORD, an Infant, by Marilyn Berry, her guardian and Next Friend, Appellant, v. James SAMPLE et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Millea, Segal & Barlett, Albany (John E. Roe, Albany, of counsel), for appellant.
Murphy, Aldrich, Guy, Broderick & Simon, Troy (William E. Noonan, Troy, of counsel), for respondent William A. Schumacher.
Donohue, Bohl, Clayton & Komar, Albany (Howard D. Clayton, Jr., Albany, of counsel), for respondent James Sample.
Before GIBSON, P.J., and REYNOLDS, AULISI, STALEY and GABRIELLI, JJ.
Appeal from orders of the Supreme Court at a Trial Term entered May 8, 1967 and May 10, 1967 in Rensselaer County, which dismissed the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case.
The infant plaintiff was 12 years of age on June 23, 1964 and was visiting her grandmother in Rensselaer, New York. She and a paymate heard the defendant Schumacher's ice cream vending truck at about 10:30 P.M. and decided to go for ice cream. The truck was well lighted and parked at an angle away from the curb on the east side of Broadway. When the girls arrived at the west side of Broadway, they crossed the street to where defendant Schumacher was selling his wares from the right side of his truck. Deciding that she wanted to buy a sundae, the plaintiff found it necessary to go back to her grandmother's house for more money. She walked behind the truck and looked south where there were no cars coming. She looked to the north but 'couldn't see * * * very far from behind the truck.' As the plaintiff headed back to the west side of Broadway, she continued to look north and when she stepped out to see, she was struck by the side view mirror of the defendant Sample's car. Plaintiff was knocked to the pavement and her right ankle was fractured.
Defendant Sample was called as a witness by the plaintiff and testified that he had just turned into Broadway heading south at about five miles per hour. He saw the ice cream truck with people around it and its backend 'jutting out into the street.' He increased his speed as he approached the truck and did not blow his horn. His car lights were on and he did not see the plaintiff until she struck or was struck by the mirror on the side of his car which was ripped off. Sample was of the opinion that the driver's side of the truck was five feet from the side of his car as he passed.
The trial court at the end of plaintiff's case granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint. The court found that as to defendant Sample there was no showing of negligence on his part and that plaintiff failed to establish freedom from contributory...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kekua v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital
...of a witness may constitute reversible error. See, e. g., Priest v. Lindig, 583 P.2d 173, 180-81 (Alaska 1978); Rodford v. Sample, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 30 (1968); Cf. State v. Napeahi, supra (exclusion of competent testimony designed to impeach the credibility of a material witness i......
-
Feldsberg v. Nitschke
...N.Y.2d 283, 360 N.Y.S.2d 878, 319 N.E.2d 196, supra; Perkins v. New York Racing Assn., 51 A.D.2d 585, 378 N.Y.S.2d 757; Rodford v. Sample, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 30; Merchants Motor Frgt. v. Downing, 227 F.2d 247 (8th Cir.)). Rather, we simply find it inappropriate to establish a per s......
-
Meyer v. State
...291 N.Y.S.2d 833), including one of Douglas' age and experience. (McNally v. Addis, 65 Misc.2d 204, 317 N.Y.S.2d 157, Rodford v. Sample, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 30.) As stated in Prosser, Torts, (4th ed) p. "Contributory negligence may consist not only in a failure to discover or apprec......
-
Fitzsimmons v. State at Stonybrook
...own age, experience and intelligence is required to use under similar circumstances. This again was a factual issue (Rodford v. Sample, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 30) and there is ample evidence to sustain the court's Judgment affirmed, with costs. HERLIHY, P.J., and STALEY, SWEENEY and KA......