Rodriguez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Decision Date | 07 July 1986 |
Citation | 132 Misc.2d 705,505 N.Y.S.2d 345 |
Parties | Susan RODRIGUEZ, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jose Rodriguez, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITALS CORPORATION, Vincent Arolay and Leo Arolay, and City of New York, Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Plaintiff, Susan Rodriguez, commenced this action by summons and verified complaint dated November 24, 1982, alleging that the medical treatment rendered her deceased husband, Jose Rodriguez, was negligent. The ninth paragraph of the complaint states that "Prior to his death, the decedent did consult with the defendant, Vincent Arolay, for the purpose of receiving treatment, care and diagnosis of a condition then afflicting him".
Dr. Vincent Arolay now moves for the complaint to be dismissed and summary judgment to be entered in his favor, essentially contending that he never treated the deceased and that there never existed any relationship of doctor and patient between them.
In support of his position, the moving defendant relies upon a deposition of Susan Rodriguez, a Notice to Admit to which plaintiff has not responded and his own affidavit setting forth his view of the occurrence.
The doctor's affidavit states:
Additionally, Dr. Arolay points to the examination before trial of Susan Rodriguez wherein she testified that "I saw him in the building and I asked him if he would come in". She also testified that all this doctor did was take Jose's pulse and heart rate and that he then called for an ambulance.
As for the Notice to Admit to which plaintiff never responded (and to which defendant New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation advised that it had no information) it requested admissions that defendant Vincent Arolay had never examined the deceased, had never made any diagnosis as to his physical or mental condition and had never treated the deceased.
In opposition to the motion, both plaintiff and co-d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hardingham v. United Counseling Service of Bennington County, Inc., 94-096
...... overdose, plaintiff suffered severe health problems, including blindness. In ...City of Detroit, 181 Mich.App. 121, 449 N.W.2d 115, ...Detroit Osteopathic Hosp. Corp., 154 Mich.App. 752, 398 N.W.2d 520, 524 (1986) ... summary judgment to defendants); Rodriguez v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 132 ......
-
Jackson v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.
...purposes of Good Samaritan immunity can be as non-invasive as rudimentary first aid. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 132 Misc.2d 705, 505 N.Y.S.2d 345 (1986), where a physician took the pulse and heart rate of a neighbor and called for an ambulance. See also ......
-
Clarken v. US
...within the intent of the legislature in enacting the Good Samaritan statute, relying on Rodriguez v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, 132 Misc.2d 705, 505 N.Y.S.2d 345 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1986). In Rodriguez, plaintiff brought suit against the treating hospital and a doctor for the de......
-
McDowell v. Gillie
...rendering actual physical assistance, can constitute rendering emergency care. See also Rodriguez v. New York City Health & Hospitals, 132 Misc.2d 705, 505 N.Y.S.2d 345, 347 (Sup.Ct.1986) (holding a physician who arranged for a neighbor to be taken to a hospital rendered emergency treatment......