Rogers v. Rogers, 115

Decision Date29 September 1965
Docket NumberNo. 115,115
Citation265 N.C. 386,144 S.E.2d 48
PartiesWilliam Scott ROGERS v. Walter Scott ROGERS, B. K. Meadows, and Jones Davis.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Uzzell & DuMont, Asheville, for plaintiff appellee.

Williams, Williams & Morris, Asheville, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, interposed at the close of plaintiff's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

A careful consideration of the evidence adduced in the trial below leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to carry the case to the jury against the defendant Davis, and we so hold.

The appellant also assigns as error numerous excerpts from the court's charge to the jury bearing on negligence, proximate cause and damages. Many of these portions of the charge are simply unintelligible. We do not believe the able judge who tried this case charged the jury in the manner in which the charge is set out in the record. Even so, counsel for the respective parties agreed to the case on appeal and we are bound by it. Respass v. Bonner, 237 N.C. 310, 74 S.E.2d 721.

The appellant is awarded a new trial.

New trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Black
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 9 Mayo 1973
    ...a minimum as well as a maximum of seven years. However, the record does not so show, and we are bound by the record. Rogers v. Rogers, 265 N.C. 386, 144 S.E.2d 48 (1965); Redd v. Mecklenburg Nurseries, 241 N.C. 385, 85 S.E.2d 311 We find no error in the trial but remand the case to the Supe......
  • Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 27 Agosto 1975
    ...to explain the exceptions and errors assigned.' The record as certified imports verity and we are bound thereby. Rogers v. Rogers, 265 N.C. 386, 144 S.E.2d 48 (1965); Redden v. Bynum, 256 N.C. 351, 123 S.E.2d 734 (1962); Griffin v. Barnes, 242 N.C. 306, 87 S.E.2d 560 In addition, the record......
  • State v. Johnson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 6 Junio 1978
    ...verity and we are bound by the record as certified. Foods, Inc. v. Super Markets, 288 N.C. 213, 217 S.E.2d 566 (1975); Rogers v. Rogers, 265 N.C. 386, 144 S.E.2d 48 (1965). One remaining assignment merits discussion at this Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a new trial......
  • Summey v. Cauthen
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 1973
    ...and that such negligence contributed to the injuries of Victor Cauthen. Day v. Davis, 268 N.C. 643, 151 S.E.2d 556; Rogers v. Rogers, 265 N.C. 386, 144 S.E.2d 48; Raper v. Byrum, 265 N.C. 269, 144 S.E.2d 38; Bridges v. Jackson, 255 N.C. 333, 121 S.E.2d 542; Lemons v. Vaughn, 255 N.C. 186, 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT