Rogers v. State, 53832

Decision Date25 May 1977
Docket NumberNo. 53832,No. 1,53832,1
Citation142 Ga.App. 387,236 S.E.2d 134
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
PartiesJ. T. ROGERS, Jr., v. The STATE

Carroll L. Cowart, Glennville, for appellant.

Dupont K. Cheney, Dist. Atty., Hinesville, for appellee.

McMURRAY, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of child molestation. Held :

1. Both shortly after the incident and again in open court, the twelve year old victim identified defendant as the person who molested her. During questioning after his arrest the defendant admitted committing the alleged acts. A verdict of guilty should be affirmed if there is any evidence to support it. Cohran v. State, 141 Ga.App. 4(1), 232 S.E.2d 355, and cases cited therein.

2. Prior to the beginning of trial, a hearing was held to determine the voluntariness of defendant's confession pursuant to Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908. At that hearing the sheriff of Evans County testified that he had questioned defendant in his office, and prior to questioning defendant was advised of his Miranda rights and agreed to talk to the sheriff without an attorney present. The sheriff testified there were no threats made, no promise was made that the defendant would get "less time," and that the interrogation was neither long nor intensive.

During questioning the sheriff did state to defendant that it would be "easier on him if he would tell the truth." The sheriff testified that these words were not intended as a promise that the defendant would receive a lighter sentence and that it did not appear to him that the defendant construed these words as a promise of a lighter sentence. On cross-examination the defendant testified that he did not interpret these words of the sheriff to be a promise of a lighter sentence if he told the sheriff what happened. Defendant also corroborated the sheriff's testimony that he was not threatened during the questioning.

Defendant contends that his confession was not voluntary and should not have been admitted into evidence at the trial. He contends that the statement by the sheriff that it would be "easier on him if he would tell the truth," created the hope of a lighter sentence if he confessed. See Code § 38-411. Defendant relies upon McLemore v. State, 181 Ga. 462, 182 S.E. 618, where the confession was held inadmissible due to testimony that the defendant may have been told it would be better for him to make a confession. "There is a material difference between a statement to a prisoner that it would be better for him to tell the truth, and one wherein he is told that it would be better for him to make a confession." McLemore v. State, supra, at 471, 182 S.E. at 623. Compare Hicks...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Hudson v. State, A19A2108
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 14, 2019
    ...for him to tell the truth, and one wherein he is told that it would be better for him to make a confession." Rogers v. State , 142 Ga. App. 387, 388 (2), 236 S.E.2d 134 (1977) (citations, punctuation, and emphasis omitted). Mere "exhortations that [an accused] should tell the truth" do not ......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 19, 1981
    ...be accepted unless the decision is clearly erroneous. Gibbs v. State, 235 Ga. 480, 482, 220 S.E.2d 254 (1975); Rogers v. State, 142 Ga.App. 387, 389, 236 S.E.2d 134 (1977). The determination by the trial court was not erroneous; accordingly, it was not error to admit appellant's 2. Appellan......
  • Hobgood v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 14, 1978
    ...be accepted by this court unless its findings are shown to be clearly erroneous, and no such showing has been made. Rogers v. State, 142 Ga.App. 387(2), 236 S.E.2d 134 (1977) and 2. Mrs. Hobgood moved to suppress from evidence the pistol, a spent shell from the pistol and a shoe she alleged......
  • Phipps v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 10, 1980
    ...offer of leniency must be accepted by this court unless these findings are shown to be clearly erroneous.' (Cit.)" Rogers v. State, 142 Ga.App. 387, 389, 236 S.E.2d 134 (1977). We do not find them erroneous and therefore Enumeration 1 is not We have examined the prosecutor's closing argumen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT