Rogers v. State, 5D10–3008.
Decision Date | 06 July 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 5D10–3008.,5D10–3008. |
Parties | Joe Edwin ROGERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Joseph H. Lang, Jr., Joshua D. Moore and Rachel May Zysk, of Carlton Fields, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
We affirm Rogers' convictions and sentences on 125 counts of possession of child pornography. Although the State's evidence was certainly not overwhelming, we conclude that it was sufficient to survive Rogers' motion for judgment of acquittal.
Rogers received a composite sentence of seventy-five years in prison. Given that the 125 child pornographic images were on a single CD–ROM and given that Rogers had no prior felony convictions, one might well conclude that the sentence was unduly harsh. However, we cannot accept Rogers' argument that his sentence violates the cruel and unusual punishment clauses of the United States 1 and Florida 2 constitutions. See, e.g., Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) ( ); Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) ( ); Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S. 370, 102 S.Ct. 703, 70 L.Ed.2d 556 (1982) ( ); Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980) ( ).
Finally, Rogers challenges the admission of an unredacted recording of an approximate one hour conversation between Rogers and his former girlfriend. He argues that the recording includes several improper and prejudicial statements made by the former girlfriend as well as certain inadmissible hearsay. However, no contemporaneous objection was made to the introduction of the recording at trial, and its admission did not constitute fundamental error....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rogers v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
...Ex. A cont'd, doc. pp. 1-4). The state appellate court affirmed the convictions and sentences in a written opinion. Rogers v. State, 96 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). The state appellate court dismissed Rogers's petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, filed under Flo......
-
Gooding v. Inch, Case No. 3:19cv3641-LC/MAF
...and unusual punishment clause. . . ."). The Defendant's sentences simply do not rise to the level of cruel or unusual. Rogers v. State, 96 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).Ex. I at 43-44. On appeal, the First DCA affirmed without a written opinion. "The Eighth Amendment, which forbids cruel a......
-
Berben v. State
...violated constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. We find that claim lacks merit. See Rogers v. State, 96 So.3d 922, 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (holding composite sentence of 75 years in prison resulting from defendant's conviction on 125 counts of possession of child ......
-
Rogers v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
...the evidence, an evidentiary ruling, and the constitutionality of his sentence, and the Fifth DCA affirmed. See Rogers v. State, 96 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2012). Rogers timely, but unsuccessfully, pursued state postconviction relief, pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850, on groun......