Ronk v. State
| Decision Date | 01 December 1976 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 51301,51302,s. 51301 |
| Parties | Nancy Carol RONK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Harold Francis RONK, Jr. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeals are taken from the convictions of the appellants in a joint trial for the offense of injury to a child. Punishment, assessed by the jury, was twenty years each.
Appellants were found to be criminally negligent for failing to obtain necessary medical treatment for two-and-a-half year old Heath Lambert, resulting in his death. The prosecution was under V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 22.04, Injury to a Child.
At the outset, we are faced with the problem of a fundamentally defective indictment.
Omitting the formal parts, the indictments in these cases charge that 'Nancy Carol Ronk' and Harold Ronk did,
'intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, and with criminal negligence engage in conduct that caused serious bodily injury to Heath E. Lambert, a child less than 15 years of age, in that said Defendant failed and refused to secure proper medical treatment for the said Heath E. Lambert after the said Heath E. Lambert received burns to his body which required medical treatment.'
V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 22.04, 'Injury to a Child,' provides:
'(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence engages in conduct that causes serious bodily injury, serious physical or mental deficiency or impairment, or deformity to a child who is 14 years of age or younger.'
V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 6.01, reads in pertinent part:
'(a) A person commits an offense only if he voluntarily engages in conduct, including an act, an omission, or possession, in violation of a statute that provides that the conduct is an offense.
(c) A person who omits to perform an act does not commit an offense unless a statute provides that the omission is an offense or otherwise provides that he has a duty to perform the act.'
V.T.C.A. Family Code, Sec. 12.04, relates to the duty of a parent 1 to provide a child with medical care, said statute providing:
'Except as otherwise provided by judicial order or by an affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights executed under Section 15.03 of this code, the parent of a child has the following rights, privileges, duties, and powers:
(3) the duty to support the child, including providing the child with clothing, food, shelter, medical care, and education; . . ..'
Section 6.01, supra, 'Requirement of Voluntary Act or Omission,' under Title 2 of the new Penal Code, 'General Principles of Criminal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Sherman
...here today, Texas has found that only the parent of a child may be convicted of child neglect under its statute. Ronk v. State, 544 S.W.2d 123, 125 (Tex.Crim. App.1976). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals based its holding on statutory terminology that "[t]he only persons charged with such......
-
Ex parte Winton
...Tex.Cr.App., 544 S.W.2d 430; Willis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 544 S.W.2d 150; Huggins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 544 S.W.2d 147; Ronk v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 544 S.W.2d 123; Pickett v. State, 542 S.W.2d 868; Timms v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 542 S.W.2d 424; Ex parte Jones, Tex.Cr.App., 542 S.W.2d 179; A......
-
Ahearn v. State
...statute each parent has a duty to support his or her minor child. Harrington v. State, 547 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Ronk v. State, 544 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); V.T.C.A., Family Code, Section In Harrington v. State, supra, the Court held that: "The omission or neglect to perform a ......
-
Behar v. Patrick
... ... Appellees then filed their first amended petition in which they asked for substitute service upon the Chairman of the State Highway Commission, as authorized by Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2039a (Vernon 1964). Service was made upon this Chairman on September 20, 1982. On ... ...