Rosier v. State

Decision Date29 March 1977
Docket NumberNo. DD--130,DD--130
Citation343 So.2d 972
PartiesGeorge W. ROSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant contends he may not be separately sentenced on five counts of manslaughter by culpable negligence because the five victims were killed in a single automobile collision, characterized by appellant as a single transaction. We cannot assent. We have upheld separate sentences for violent crimes consecutively directed against two or more persons. Booth v. State, 332 So.2d 157 (Fla.1st DCA 1976). We have also upheld separate sentences for violent crimes simultaneously directed toward two or more persons. Robinson v. State, 323 So.2d 62 (Fla.1st DCA 1975). Assuming as appellant argues that the accused there intended that his offense affect two or more persons, the same may be said for appellant's culpable indifference to the safety and number of his victims in this case, which was equivalent to an intentional violation of their safety. Cornell v. State, 159 Fla. 687, 32 So.2d 610 (1947); Preston v. State, 56 So.2d 543 (Fla.1952); Maxey v. State, 64 So.2d 677 (Fla.1953).

The trial court erred, as the State concedes, in purporting to impose a driving prohibition as a condition of any future parole from the flat sentences imposed and purporting to require, alternatively, that a member of the parole commission then accompany appellant when he operates a vehicle 'so that they will be in as much jeopardy as other innocent persons on the highways.'

The purported parole conditions are stricken from the sentences and, as so modified, the judgments are

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Bautista v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 4 décembre 2003
    ...(affirming three first-degree murder convictions where codefendants killed three people during a robbery); Rosier v. State, 343 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (permitting five counts of manslaughter by culpable negligence where five victims were killed in a single automobile crash). Hom......
  • Wright v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 31 octobre 1978
    ...in the pedestrian's death. The evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant's conviction for manslaughter. See also Rosier v. State, 343 So.2d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Though the evidence was sufficient to convict, we find that the prosecutor improperly commented to the jury on appellant's ......
  • Com. v. Meehan
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 18 novembre 1982
    ...355 U.S. 890, 78 S.Ct. 262, 2 L.Ed.2d 189 (1957); Murray v. United States, 358 A.2d 314, 320-321 (D.C.1976); Rosier v. Florida, 343 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1977). Finally, the establishment of the penalty for the offense is a matter entrusted to the discretion of the Legislature. Se......
  • Freeman v. State, 79-703
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 mai 1980
    ...Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ondina Felipe, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rozier v. State, 343 So.2d 972 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). ANSTEAD, MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT