Roski v. Roski, 97-03734.
| Decision Date | 23 April 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-03734.,97-03734. |
| Citation | 730 So.2d 413 |
| Parties | Douglas Allan ROSKI, Appellant, v. Melanie Margareta ROSKI, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Karol K. Williams and Allison M. Perry, Tampa, for Appellant.
Thomas G. Hersem, Clearwater, for Appellee.
Douglas Allan Roski, the father, contends the trial court erred in awarding the Mother sole custody of the parties' two children. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion on the custody decision and, accordingly, affirm. We reverse, however, as to the requirement that the Father's visitation be supervised.
This was the type of custody battle that makes the term "embittered" a complete understatement. The record contains volumes of conflicting evidence concerning the parties' acrimonious conduct leading up to the dissolution hearing. Despite the conflicting evidence, the record supports the trial court's determination that the Mother was entitled to be the residential parent. In its order, the trial court evaluated the evidence and credibility of the witnesses vis-a-vis the criteria set forth in section 61.13, Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court further found that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the children. See § 61.13(2)(b)2. Because the trial court's order is supported by the record evidence, we find no abuse of discretion in the decision to award the Mother sole parental responsibility. See Longo v. Longo, 576 So.2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
(). The record makes it clear that these parties were unable to reach agreement on any subject. Joint custody would be an invitation for weekly journeys to family court. Accordingly, we affirm.
We reverse, however, the requirement for supervised visitation as we do not find evidence in the record to support the need for supervision. The Father was the residential parent during the pendency of the proceedings, without any evidence that his custody endangered the children. Although conduct toward the Mother was found to be unacceptable during this time, there was no evidence that would require supervision during his visitation with the children.1
We must note that the Father's credibility was severely undermined by his refusal to participate in court-ordered psychological counseling. The Father alleged an inability to pay the costs of counseling while admitting that his family had contributed $100,000 to pay his attorney's fees. The Father's failure to cooperate with Marian Menzel, the court appointed guardian ad litem, also factored into the custody decision he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
LAROCKA v. LAROCKA, 5D09-1117.
...(citing McAlister v. Shaver, 633 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Wattles v. Wattles, 631 So.2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Roski v. Roski, 730 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999))). There is no transcript of the trial proceedings and the record before us is rather sparse. The lack of a transcript or a......
-
Allyn v. Allyn
... ... 5th DCA 1994); Wattles ... v. Wattles, 631 So.2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Roski ... v. Roski, 730 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Scaringe ... v. Herrick, 711 So.2d 204 ... ...
-
Perez v. Perez, 99-2182.
...However, the duties and responsibilities of a guardian ad litem are not coextensive with those of an attorney. See Roski v. Roski, 730 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); see also Representing Children: Standards For Attorneys and Guardians Ad Litem In Custody or Visitation Proceedings (With Comm......
-
Shugar v. Shugar, 1D05-5569.
...e.g., McAlister v. Shaver, 633 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Wattles v. Wattles, 631 So.2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Roski v. Roski, 730 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (Blue, J., specially concurring). Cf. Singleton v. State, 582 So.2d 65......
-
Parental responsibility
...may be awarded if one parent interferes with other parent’s access to child if this award is in child’s best interests); Roski v. Roski, 730 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (where parents could not agree to single thing, sole parental responsibility proper; detriment to children demonstrated ......
-
Discovery and use of experts
...become more than just a piece of evidence, which it is supposed to be, to have more weight than they should. [ Roski v. Roski, 730 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(trial courts are cautioned against abdicating their decision-making responsibility to guardians ad litem, and strongly encouraged ......
-
Guardians ad Litem: a solution without strength in helping protect dependent children.
...at best. Second District cases after Scaringe have continued to express that court's wariness regarding GALs. In Roski v. Roski, 730 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), the court considered a custody battle arising out of a dissolution of marriage proceeding. As part of his appeal, the father cl......