Shugar v. Shugar, 1D05-5569.
| Decision Date | 05 April 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D05-5569.,1D05-5569. |
| Citation | 924 So.2d 941 |
| Parties | Michelle C. SHUGAR, Petitioner, v. Joel K. SHUGAR, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Sandow, Live Oak, for Petitioner.
Joseph R. Boyd, Joseph A. Boyd, Jr., and J. Robert Boyd, Jr. of Boyd, Lindsey & Sliger, P.L., Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Michelle C. Shugar contends in her petition for writ of certiorari that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by issuing three orders ruling that the guardian ad litem (GAL), appointed for the benefit of the parties' minor son, has the authority to make all decisions regarding visitation of the child with his parents. We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.
Section 61.13, Florida Statutes (2005), sets forth the trial court's obligations when determining custody and visitation matters. Section 61.13(2)(a), provides that "[t]he court shall have jurisdiction to determine custody"; subsection (2)(b)(1) requires "[t]he court [to] determine all matters relating to custody of each minor child of the parties in accordance with the best interests of the child"; and subsection (2)(b)2.b. directs "[t]he court" to determine visitation rights of a parent when it has ordered sole parental responsibility to the other parent.1 (Emphasis added.)
Courts may not delegate their statutory authority to determine visitation to GALs, attorneys, or experts. See, e.g., McAlister v. Shaver, 633 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Wattles v. Wattles, 631 So.2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Roski v. Roski, 730 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (Blue, J., specially concurring). Cf. Singleton v. State, 582 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
The petition is GRANTED.
1. Section 61.403, Florida Statutes (2005), outlines the powers and authority of a GAL. It requires the GAL to work closely with the court to obtain evidence and information, and authorizes the GAL to make recommendations and reports to the court. None of the provisions authorizes the GAL to make independent decisions that are binding on the parties.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
LAROCKA v. LAROCKA, 5D09-1117.
...allowed to be in the presence of the children. This determination is solely within the province of a court of law."); Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So.2d 941, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("Courts may not delegate their statutory authority to determine visitation to [guardians ad litem], attorneys, or e......
-
Allyn v. Allyn
......This determination is solely within the province of. a court of law."); Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So.2d. 941, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("Courts may not delegate. their ......
-
Subramanian v. Subramanian, 4D16–4263
...erred insofar as the order delegates authority to determine visitation to therapists and the guardian ad litem. See Shugar v. Shugar , 924 So.2d 941, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("Courts may not delegate their statutory authority to determine visitation to GALs, attorneys, or experts."). Accord......
-
Barrack v. Barrack
......See. Subramanian v. Subramanian, 239 So.3d 719, 721 (Fla. 4th. DCA 2018); Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So.2d 941, 942. (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("Courts may not delegate their. ......
-
Understanding Decision Making Authority Under A Florida Parenting Plan
...timesharing schedule with a child. See also, Lovell v. Lovell, 14 So. 3d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Similarly, in Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), the First District found a trial court's orders were improper where they placed decision making authority concerning time sh......
-
Emergencies and case management conference
...authority to determine a parent’s visitation to third parties such as guardian ad litems and therapists. See also Shugar v. Shugar , 924 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). §9:123 Court Appointment of Expert Required; Parenting Plan Recommendation If the parents need assistance in developing a ......
-
Trial and evidence
...all persons interviewed in connection with case so that husband was free to interview or depose any of them).] CASES • Shugar v. Shugar, 924 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Trial court was prohibited from delegating its statutory authority to guardian ad litem (GAL) to determine child visit......
-
Domestic violence
...stated that it “needed” a guardian ad litem, it was reversible error to fail to appoint one. [§61.401, Fla. Stat.] • Shugar v. Shugar , 924 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Trial court was prohibited from delegating its statutory authority to guardian ad litem (GAL) to determine child visita......