Royal Indemnity Company v. Cardillo
| Decision Date | 25 October 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 411,411 |
| Citation | Royal Indemnity Company v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S.Ct. 122, 82 L.Ed. 569 (1937) |
| Parties | ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners, v. Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie. * |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.
Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.
For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S.Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett
...affirmed 2 Cir., 82 F.2d 1022; Hoage v. Royal Indemnity Co., 67 App. D.C. 142, 90 F.2d 387, certiorari denied Royal Ind. Co. v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S.Ct. 122, 82 L.Ed. 569; Speaks v. Hoage, 64 App.D.C. 324, 78 F.2d 208, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 574, 56 S.Ct. 121, 80 L.Ed. 405; Malo......
-
Southern Stevedoring Co. v. Henderson
...1682; Hoage, Deputy Commissioner, v. Royal Indemnity Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.2d 387, certiorari denied Royal Indemnity Co. v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S.Ct. 122, 82 L.Ed. 569; Henderson, Deputy Commissioner, v. Pate Stevedoring Co., 5 Cir., 134 F.2d 440; Harbor Marine Contracting Co. v......
-
Seitz v. L & R Industries, Inc. (Palco Products Division)
...(1980).2 1B Larson, supra at § 42.21.3 See, e.g., Hoage v. Royal Indem. Co., 90 F.2d 387 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S.Ct. 122, 82 L.Ed. 569 (1937); Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Bd., 11 Cal.3d 274, 520 P.2d 978, 113 Cal.Rptr. 162 (1974); Firemen's Fund Indem. Co. v.......
-
JV Vozzolo, Inc. v. Britton, 20171.
...342, 127 F.2d 334 (1942); Hoage v. Royal Indemnity Co., 67 App. D.C. 142, 90 F.2d 387, cert. denied Royal Indemnity Co. v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736, 58 S.Ct. 122, 82 L.Ed. 569 (1937); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Hoage, 63 App.D.C. 323, 324, 72 F. 2d 191, 192 (1934); Hoage v. Employers'......
Get Started for Free